UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
transition period from
to _______
Commission
file number: 001-33264
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
Delaware
|
68-0623433
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
17150
South Margay Avenue
Carson,
CA 90746
(Address
of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)
(310)
735-0085
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x
No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
Accelerated Filer ¨
Accelerated
Filer ¨
Non-Accelerated
Filer ¨ (Do not check if a
smaller reporting
company) Smaller
Reporting Company x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨
No x
As of
November 3, 2008, the registrant had 29,846,757 shares of common stock, $0.001
par value, outstanding.
U.S.
AUTO PARTS NETWORK, INC.
QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR
THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2008 (unaudited) and December
31, 2007
|
3
|
|
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
ITEM
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
|
ITEM
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
ITEM
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
|
|
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
|
ITEM 1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
|
ITEM
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
ITEM
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
|
ITEM
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
ITEM
5.
|
Other
Information
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
Exhibits
|
|
Unless
the context requires otherwise, as used in this report, the terms “U.S. Auto
Parts,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to U.S. Auto Parts Network,
Inc. and its subsidiaries, and the term “Partsbin” refers to All OEM Parts,
Inc., ThePartsBin.com, Inc. and their affiliated companies, which we acquired
and merged into our wholly-owned subsidiary, Partsbin, Inc., in May
2006.
U.S. Auto
Parts ®, U.S. Auto Parts
Network ™, PartsTrain ®, Partsbin ™, Kool-Vue ™ and Auto-Vend ™ are our United
States common law trademarks. All other trademarks and trade names appearing in
this report are the property of their respective owners.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
report contains statements that do not relate strictly to historical or current
facts, and anticipate results based on management's beliefs and assumptions and
on information currently available to management. These statements are
forward looking statements for the purposes of the safe harbor provided by
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”), and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities
Act”). In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms
such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,”
“may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “should,” “will,” “would”
and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements include but are not limited to statements regarding
our anticipated sales, revenue, expenses, profits and losses, capital needs,
capital deployment, liquidity, contracts, litigation, product offerings,
customers, acquisitions, competition and the status of our facilities.
Forward-looking statements, no matter where they occur in this document or in
other statements attributable to the Company involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance
or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performances
or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We
discuss many of these risks in greater detail under the heading “Risk Factors”
in Part II, Item 1A of this report. Given these uncertainties, you should
not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. You should read
this report and the documents that we reference in this report and have filed as
exhibits to the report completely and with the understanding that our actual
future results may be materially different from what we expect. Also,
forward-looking statements represent our management’s beliefs and assumptions
only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we assume no
obligation to update these forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the
reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the
future.
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
U.S.
AUTO PARTS NETWORK, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except share amounts and par value)
|
|
September
30,
2008
|
|
|
December 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
33,122
|
|
|
$
|
19,399
|
|
Marketable
securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
22,650
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
1,489
|
|
|
|
2,907
|
|
Inventory,
net
|
|
|
12,105
|
|
|
|
11,191
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
Other
current assets
|
|
|
2,953
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
50,500
|
|
|
|
58,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
|
7,210
|
|
|
|
6,945
|
|
Intangible
assets, net
|
|
|
3,710
|
|
|
|
26,444
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
14,201
|
|
|
|
14,201
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
12,428
|
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
6,351
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
non-current assets
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
94,516
|
|
|
$
|
110,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$
|
5,821
|
|
|
$
|
8,103
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
6,916
|
|
|
|
7,822
|
|
Notes
payable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Capital
leases payable, current portion
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Other
current liabilities
|
|
|
1,573
|
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
14,376
|
|
|
|
18,365
|
|
Capital
leases payable, less current portion
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
14,376
|
|
|
|
18,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized at September 30,
2008 and
December 31,
2007; 29,846,757 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2008
and
December 31,
2007
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
145,534
|
|
|
|
143,223
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(73)
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(65,351)
|
|
|
|
(51,922
|
)
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
80,140
|
|
|
|
91,643
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
94,516
|
|
|
$
|
110,056
|
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
U.S.
AUTO PARTS NETWORK, INC.
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in
thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
36,554
|
|
|
$
|
37,787
|
|
|
$
|
119,668
|
|
|
$
|
123,642
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
24,485
|
|
|
|
24,096
|
|
|
|
79,262
|
|
|
|
82,497
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
12,069
|
|
|
|
13,691
|
|
|
|
40,406
|
|
|
|
41,145
|
|
Operating
expenses (1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
4,170
|
|
|
|
3,184
|
|
|
|
13,381
|
|
|
|
9,715
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
5,240
|
|
|
|
4,917
|
|
|
|
17,842
|
|
|
|
15,738
|
|
Fulfillment
|
|
|
2,322
|
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
|
|
6,787
|
|
|
|
5,499
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
2,512
|
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
Amortization
of intangibles and impairment loss
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
23,005
|
|
|
|
6,251
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
13,138
|
|
|
|
12,556
|
|
|
|
63,527
|
|
|
|
38,597
|
|
Income
(loss) from operations
|
|
|
(1,069)
|
|
|
|
1,135
|
|
|
|
(23,121)
|
|
|
|
2,548
|
|
Other
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (loss)
|
|
|
(22)
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(17)
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Interest
income, net
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
Total
other income
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(853)
|
|
|
|
1,527
|
|
|
|
(22,397)
|
|
|
|
3,210
|
|
Income
tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(362)
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
(8,968)
|
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(491)
|
|
|
$
|
894
|
|
|
$
|
(13,429)
|
|
|
$
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.02)
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.45)
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Shares
used in computation of basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
29,846,757
|
|
|
|
29,837,538
|
|
|
|
29,846,757
|
|
|
|
27,744,016
|
|
Shares
used in computation of diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
29,846,757
|
|
|
|
30,009,891
|
|
|
|
29,846,757
|
|
|
|
28,749,521
|
|
(1)
|
Includes
share-based compensation expense as
follows:
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
General
and administrative
|
|
$
|
541
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
1,545
|
|
|
$
|
1,196
|
Marketing
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
248
|
Fulfillment
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
70
|
Technology
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
48
|
Total
share-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
|
$
|
532
|
|
|
$
|
2,068
|
|
|
$
|
1,562
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
U.S.
AUTO PARTS NETWORK, INC.
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
thousands)
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(13,429)
|
|
|
$
|
1,901
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
2,674
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
Amortization
of intangibles
|
|
|
4,560
|
|
|
|
6,251
|
|
Impairment
loss on intangibles
|
|
|
18,445
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Non-cash
interest expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
Loss
from disposition of assets
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Share-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
2,068
|
|
|
|
1,562
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
(8,866)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
1,418
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
Inventory,
net
|
|
|
(914)
|
|
|
|
(3,147)
|
|
Other
current assets
|
|
|
(1,162)
|
|
|
|
(748)
|
|
Other
non-current assets
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(3,080)
|
|
|
|
(1,442)
|
|
Other
current liabilities
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
(639)
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
6,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
to property and equipment
|
|
|
(2,894)
|
|
|
|
(3,488)
|
|
Proceeds
from the sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
21,650
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Purchases
of marketable securities
|
|
|
(5,500)
|
|
|
|
(25,000)
|
|
Cash
paid for intangible assets
|
|
|
(414)
|
|
|
|
(1,286)
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
12,842
|
|
|
|
(29,774)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
on line of credit
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,000)
|
|
Payments
on notes payable
|
|
|
(1,000)
|
|
|
|
(32,000)
|
|
Proceeds
received on issuance of common stock in connection with
initial
public offering, net of offering costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
71,537
|
|
Payments
of short-term financing
|
|
|
(56)
|
|
|
|
(51)
|
|
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(1,056)
|
|
|
|
37,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of changes in foreign currencies
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
13,723
|
|
|
|
14,805
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
19,399
|
|
|
|
2,381
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
33,122
|
|
|
$
|
17,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
U.S.
AUTO PARTS NETWORK, INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1—Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis
of Presentation
The
condensed consolidated financial statements of U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc.
(collectively with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Form 10-Q and Article 10 of SEC
Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting
of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the consolidated
financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007, and the consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, and cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007. Certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP
have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.
The Company’s results of operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of those to be expected for
the entire year. The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be
read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007, which was filed with the SEC on April 2,
2008.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates made by management
include, but are not limited to, the valuation of investments, the valuation of
inventory, valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, estimated useful
lives of property, equipment and software, valuation of intangible assets,
including goodwill, recoverability of software development costs, estimation of
sales returns and allowances, and the provision for doubtful accounts. These
estimates are based on current facts, historical experience and various other
factors that the Company believes to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
During
the second quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge on
long-lived assets totaling $18.4 million as further described in Note 4 to
the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this
report.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141 (revised 2007),
“Business Combinations”
(“SFAS 141R”), which replaces SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” and
establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the
acquiree. SFAS 141R also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the
goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and
financial effects of the business combination. This statement applies
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. Early adoption of SFAS 141R is prohibited. The Company will
apply SFAS 141R to any acquisition occurring after January 1,
2008.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") No. 142-3, "Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets" (“FSP 142-3”). FSP 142-3 amends the factors an
entity should consider in developing renewal or extension assumptions used in
determining the useful life or recognized intangible assets under
SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets" (“SFAS 142”). This new guidance applies prospectively to
intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets
in business combinations and asset acquisitions. FSP 142-3 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company
does not expect the adoption of FSP 142-3 will have a material effect on its
financial position and results of operations.
Reclassifications
Certain
reclassifications have been made to prior year financial statements in order to
conform to current year presentation.
The
Company has historically experienced seasonality in its business. The Company
expects seasonality to continue in future years as automobile collisions during
inclement weather generally create increased demand for auto body parts in
winter months and consumers often undertake projects to maintain and enhance the
performance of their automobiles in the summer months. The Company anticipates
that seasonality will continue to have a material impact on the Company’s
financial condition and results of operations in future years.
Note 2—Fair
Value Measurements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS
157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. In February 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157-2, “
Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157” (“SFAS 157-2”), which delays the effective
date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring
basis. The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 as of January 1,
2008 for financials assets including cash and cash equivalents and marketable
securities and SFAS 157-2 as of June 30, 2008 for intangible
assets.
SFAS 157
establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used
in measuring fair value. These tiers include:
Level 1-
defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active
markets;
Level 2-
defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either
directly or indirectly observable; and
Level 3-
defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists,
therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
Recurring
Financial Assets
As of
September 30, 2008, the Company held certain assets that are required to be
measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These assets included the Company’s
financial instruments, including investments associated with auction rate
preferred securities (“ARPS”). The Company measures the following financial
assets at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value of these financial
assets was determined using the following inputs at September 30,
2008:
|
|
Total
as
of
September
30, 2008
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
in
Active Markets
for
Identical Assets
(Level
1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level
2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents (1)
|
|
$ |
33,122 |
|
|
$ |
33,122 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Non-current
investments available-for-sale (2)
|
|
|
6,351 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,351 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
39,473 |
|
|
$ |
33,122 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
6,351 |
|
(1)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents consist primarily of money market funds with original
maturity dates of three months or less, for which the Company determines
fair value through quoted market
prices.
|
(2)
|
Investments
available-for-sale consists of ARPS. ARPS are tax-exempt, long-term
variable rate securities tied to short-term interest rates that are reset
through a “Dutch Auction” process that occurs every seven days. The
Company has the option to participate in the auction and sell ARPS to
prospective buyers through a broker-dealer, but does not have the right to
put the security back to the issuer. The investments in ARPS all had AAA
credit ratings at the time of purchase and represent interests in
collateralized debt obligations issued by municipal and state agencies. In
the past, the auction process has allowed investors to obtain immediate
liquidity if so desired by selling the securities at their face amounts.
However, as has been recently reported in the financial press, the current
disruptions in the credit markets have adversely affected the auction
market for these types of securities. ARPS auctions “fail” when there are
not enough buyers to absorb the amount of securities available for sale
for that particular auction period. Historically, ARPS auctions have
rarely failed since the investment banks and broker dealers have been
willing to purchase the securities when investor demand was weak. However,
beginning in mid-February 2008, due to uncertainty in the global credit
and capital markets and other factors, investment banks and broker dealers
have been less willing to support ARPS and many ARPS auctions have failed.
The Company will not be able to access non-current investments until
future auctions for these ARPS are successful, or until the Company sells
the securities in a secondary market, which currently is not active,
although there have been certain instances of redemptions at par by
municipalities through the refinancing of new
instruments.
|
As of
September 30, 2008, the Company had invested $6.5 million par value in ARPS,
which are classified as available for sale non-current investments and reflected
at fair value in the financial statements totaling $6.4 million. As of September
30, 2008, $1.3 million of investments in ARPS had been redeemed. The
Company has included its investments related to ARPS in the Level 3
category.
Before
utilizing Level 3 inputs in its fair value measurement, the Company considered
significant Level 2 observable inputs of similar assets in active and inactive
markets. The Company’s broker dealer received estimated market values from an
independent pricing service as of the balance sheet date, which carry these
investments at par value due to the overall quality of the underlying
investments and the anticipated future market for such investments. Further
evidence includes the fact that these investments consist solely of
collateralized debt obligations supported by municipal and state agencies; do
not include mortgage-backed securities or student loans; have redemption
features that call for redemption at 100% of par value; and have a current
credit rating of A or AAA. However, the fact that there is not an active market
to liquidate these certain investments was considered in classifying them as
Level 3. Due to the uncertainty with regard to the short-term liquidity of these
securities, the Company determined that it could not rely on par value to
represent fair value. Therefore, the Company estimated the fair values of these
securities utilizing a discounted cash flow valuation model as of September 30,
2008. This analysis considered the collateralization underlying the security
investments, the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected
future cash flows, and the expectation of the next time the security is expected
to have a successful auction. These securities were also compared, when
possible, to other observable market data with similar characteristics to the
securities held by the Company.
As a
result of the temporary declines in fair value for the Company’s ARPS, which the
Company attributes to liquidity issues rather than credit issues, it has
recorded an unrealized loss of $149,000 to accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss). Due to the Company’s belief that the market for these
collateralized instruments may take in excess of twelve months to fully recover,
the Company has classified these investments as non-current and has included
them in investments on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet at
September 30, 2008. As of September 30, 2008, the Company continues
to earn interest on all of its ARPS instruments. Any future fluctuation in fair
value related to these instruments that the Company deems to be temporary,
including any recoveries of previous write-downs, would be recorded to
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). If the Company determines that
any future valuation adjustment was other than temporary, it would record a
charge to earnings as appropriate. The Company is not certain how long it may be
required to hold each security. However, given the Company’s current cash
position, liquid cash equivalents and expected cash flow from operations, it
believes it has the ability to hold, and intends to continue to hold the failed
ARPS as long-term investments until the market stabilizes.
The
following table presents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a
recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as defined in
SFAS 157 at September 30, 2008:
|
|
Long-term
Investments
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Transfers
to Level 3
|
|
|
7,750
|
|
Redemption
|
|
|
(1,250)
|
|
Unrealized
losses recorded to other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(149)
|
|
Balance
at September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
6,351
|
|
Non-Recurring
Financial Assets
As of
September 30, 2008, the Company held certain assets that are measured at fair
value on a non-recurring basis. These included the Company’s long-lived and
indefinite lived intangible assets. The fair value of these non-financial assets
was determined using the following inputs at June 30, 2008 and were not revalued
to their fair value as of September 30, 2008:
|
Total
as
of
June
30, 2008
|
|
Quoted Prices
in
Active Markets
for
Identical Assets
(Level
1)
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level
2)
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
|
Total
(Losses)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Intangible
assets
|
|
$ |
3,707 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
3,707 |
|
|
$ |
(18,445 |
) |
In
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144 (“SFAS 144”) “Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, intangible assets subject to amortization
with a carrying value of $19.9 million were written down to their fair value of
$2.2 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $17.7 million during the
quarter ended June 30, 2008, which was included in earnings for the period and
is further described in Note 4 to the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements included in this report.
In accordance
with the provisions of SFAS 142 indefinite lived intangible assets with a
carrying value of $2.2 million were written down during the quarter ended June
30, 2008 to their fair value of $1.5 million, resulting in an impairment charge
of $0.7 million, which was included in earnings for the period and is further
described in Note 4 to the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements included in this report.
Note 3—Inventory
Inventories
consist of finished goods available-for-sale and are stated at the lower of cost
or market value, determined using the first in, first out (“FIFO”) method. The
Company purchases inventory from suppliers both domestically and
internationally. The Company believes that its inventoried products are
generally available from more than one supplier and seeks to maintain multiple
sources for its products, both internationally and domestically.
The
Company primarily purchases products in bulk quantities to take advantage of
quantity discounts and to improve inventory availability. Inventory is reported
net of inventory reserves for excess or obsolete products, which are established
based on specific identification of slow moving items and the evaluation of
overstock considering anticipated sales levels. Gross inventory, inventory
reserves and net inventory at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are
as follows:
|
|
September
30,
2008
|
|
|
December 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Gross inventory
|
|
$
|
13,180
|
|
|
$
|
11,794
|
|
Inventory reserves
|
|
|
(1,075)
|
|
|
|
(603)
|
|
Total net inventory
|
|
$
|
12,105
|
|
|
$
|
11,191
|
|
Note 4—Intangibles
Intangibles
subject to amortization are expensed on a straight-line basis. Amortization
expense relating to intangibles totaled $4.6 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007. Assembled workforce included in the
intangible assets was decreased by $174,000 and increased by $159,000 due to
foreign currency fluctuations as of September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively.
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded, in accordance with SFAS
144, a non-cash impairment charge totaling $18.4 million related to the
intangibles associated with the Partsbin business, which the Company acquired in
May 2006. The impairment was comprised of $16.7 million for its
websites; $0.1 million for software; $0.9 million for vendor agreements; and
$0.7 million for domain names. The interim impairment charge was primarily the
result of: (i) the recent deterioration in the economic environment
and the Company’s stock price, (ii) lower sales and profitability which
generated losses from certain Partsbin websites, (iii) deficiencies in the
software platform also acquired from Partsbin, and (iv) the termination of
volume discounts and marketing co-ops from certain vendor
agreements. Given the indicators of impairment and the excess of
carrying value over the undiscounted cash flows associated with these
intangibles, the Company utilized a discounted cash flow approach in determining
fair value for both the websites and vendor agreement intangible
assets. The decrease in future cash flows from certain acquired
websites and vendor agreements resulted in the long-lived assets being impaired,
as the carrying value of the website assets and vendor agreement assets
exceeded the fair value of those assets. Fair value is determined as
the net present value of future projected cash flows. The software
and domain name assets’ fair value was determined using a relief from royalty
approach which also resulted in a lower fair value than the carrying
value. The intangible assets listed below as of September 30, 2008
represent the adjusted basis after the impairment loss.
During
the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Company acquired certain websites and
domain names for a purchase price of $415,000, of which $386,000 was allocated
to amortizable intangibles. The intangible assets were valued
using a discounted cash flow model and the estimated useful life of the
amortizable assets was determined to be five years.
Intangibles,
excluding goodwill, consisted of the following at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
September
30, 2008
(unaudited)
|
|
|
December 31,
2007
|
|
|
Useful
Life
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Accum.
Amort.
|
|
|
Net
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Accum.
Amort.
|
|
|
Net
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Intangible
assets subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Websites
|
5
years
|
|
$ |
386 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
386 |
|
|
$ |
28,988 |
|
|
$ |
(9,367 |
) |
|
$ |
19,621 |
|
Software
|
2 -
5 years
|
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
4,089 |
|
|
|
(2,202 |
) |
|
|
1,887 |
|
Vendor
agreements
|
3 years
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,996 |
|
|
|
(1,613 |
) |
|
|
1,383 |
|
Assembled
workforce
|
7 years
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
1,291 |
|
Purchased
domain names
|
3 years
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
2,872 |
|
|
|
(747 |
) |
|
|
2,125 |
|
|
|
37,694 |
|
|
|
(13,480 |
) |
|
|
24,214 |
|
Intangible
assets not subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domain
names
|
indefinite life
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
|
2,230 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$ |
4,457 |
|
|
$ |
(747 |
) |
|
$ |
3,710 |
|
|
$ |
39,924 |
|
|
$ |
(13,480 |
) |
|
$ |
26,444 |
|
The
Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary
course of its business. Although occasional adverse decisions or settlements may
occur, the potential loss, if any, cannot be reasonably estimated. However, the
Company believes that the final disposition of such matters will not have a
material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash
flow of the Company with the exception of the items noted below. The Company
maintains liability insurance coverage to protect the Company’s assets from
losses arising out of or involving activities associated with ongoing and normal
business operations.
Ford
Global Technologies, LLC
On
December 2, 2005, Ford Global Technologies, LLC (“Ford”) filed a complaint,
subsequently amended, with the United States International Trade Commission
(“USITC”) against the Company and five other named Respondents, including four
Taiwan-based manufacturers, contending that the Company and the other
Respondents infringed 14 design patents that Ford alleged cover eight parts on
the 2004-2005 Ford F-150 truck (the “Ford Design Patents”). Ford asked the
USITC to issue a permanent general exclusion order excluding from entry into the
United States all automotive parts that infringe the Ford Design Patents and
that are imported into the United States, sold for importation in the United
States, or sold within the United States after importation. Ford also sought a
permanent order directing the Company and the other Respondents to cease and
desist from, among other things, selling, marketing, advertising, distributing
and offering for sale imported automotive parts that infringe the Ford Design
Patents.
On
June 6, 2007, the USITC issued its Notice of Final Determination. The
Notice of Final Determination denied Respondent’s petition for reconsideration
and their motion for leave to supplement their petition. In addition, the USITC
issued a general exclusion order prohibiting the importation of certain
automotive parts found to infringe the seven Ford design patents found valid.
The USITC’s decision became final on August 6, 2007. On May 18, 2007,
Ford filed a Notice of Appeal with the United States Federal Circuit Court of
Appeals with regard to the three patents declared invalid in the ALJ’s Initial
Determination. On August 23, 2007, the Respondents filed a Notice of Appeal
with the United States Federal Court of Appeals for the federal circuit.
The appeals were consolidated. On October 17, 2008, the parties finished
briefing the appeal. The federal circuit will likely hear oral arguments
from the parties during the first quarter of 2009.
The
Company will continue to defend this action vigorously. At the time the
exclusion order was issued, the parts that are subject to the order comprised
only a minimal amount of the Company’s sales. However, as such parts become
incorporated into more vehicles over time; it is likely that the amount of the
Company’s sales of such parts could have increased substantially. If the ten
design patents in question are ultimately found on appeal to be valid and
infringed, it is not anticipated that the loss of sales of these parts will be
materially adverse to the Company’s financial condition, cash flows or results
of operations. However, depending upon the nature and extent of any adverse
ruling, other auto manufacturers may attempt to assert similar allegations based
upon design patents on a significant number of parts for several of their
models, which over time could have a material adverse impact on the entire
aftermarket parts industry.
On May 2,
2008, Ford filed with the USITC another complaint under Section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930. The complaint alleges that the Company and seven other
domestic and foreign entities import and sell certain automotive parts relating
to the 2005 Ford Mustang that infringes eight Ford design
patents. The USITC voted to institute an investigation, notice of
which was published in the Federal Register on June
5, 2008. The Company has obtained extensions of its response date to
Ford's complaint because the parties have been negotiating
settlement. The Company expects settlement to be completed during
the first half of 2009.
Securities
Litigation
On
March 24, 2007, a putative stockholder class action lawsuit was filed
against the Company and certain officers, directors and underwriters in the U.S.
District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint
alleged that the Company filed a false Registration Statement in connection with
the Company’s initial public offering in violation of Section 11 and
Section 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities
Act”). On April 26, 2007, a second complaint containing substantially
similar allegations was filed, and also included a claim under
Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act. The complaints were
consolidated on May 15, 2007. A lead plaintiff was selected on
August 9, 2007. The amended consolidated complaint was filed on
October 4, 2007, alleging violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the
Securities Act. The amended complaint was against the Company and certain
current and former officers, as well as Oak Investment Partners XI, LP, and the
underwriters involved in the initial public offering. The amended
consolidated complaint alleged that the Company’s Registration Statement failed
to disclose material information and misstated the Company’s financial
results. Plaintiffs sought compensatory damages, restitution, unspecified
equitable relief, as well as attorneys’ fees and costs. In January 2008,
the parties reached a settlement in principle. A definitive settlement agreement
was filed on May 1, 2008, which settlement was preliminarily
approved by the Court on June 13, 2008. The Company’s contribution to the
settlement consideration of approximately $3.4 million plus legal expenses has
been accrued in the Company’s financial statements as of December 31, 2007. The
settlement consideration was funded in July 2008 to an escrow
account. On October 15, 2008, the United States District Court Judge
for the Central District of California issued a final order and judgment
approving the settlement and dismissing the case with prejudice.
In August
2007, the Company also received a letter from the SEC that indicated that the
SEC had commenced an informal inquiry into the events leading up to the
Company’s announcement on March 20, 2007 of its financial results for the
fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2006. On October 30, 2008,
the Company received correspondence from the SEC concluding the inquiry and
recommending no enforcement action.
Note 6—Comprehensive
Income
The
Company reports comprehensive income in accordance with SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive
Income,” which defines comprehensive income as net income affected by
non-stockholder changes in equity. Comprehensive income (loss) for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, includes the
following:
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September 30
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(491 |
) |
|
$ |
894 |
|
|
$ |
(13,429 |
) |
|
$ |
1,901 |
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
97 |
|
Unrealized
loss in investments
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(572 |
) |
|
$ |
961 |
|
|
$ |
(13,813 |
) |
|
$ |
1,998 |
|
Note 7—Reserve
For Sales Returns
Sales
discounts are recorded in the period in which the related sale is recognized.
Credits are issued to customers for returned products which totaled $15.6
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The Company’s sales
returns and allowances reserve totaled $669,000 and $710,000 at September 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
The
following table provides an analysis of the reserve for the Company’s sales
returns:
|
|
Balance at
Beginning of
Period
|
|
|
Charged to
Revenue
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
Balance at End
of
Period
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Reserve for sales
returns:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
$ |
710 |
|
|
$ |
15,575 |
|
|
$ |
(15,616 |
) |
|
$ |
669 |
|
Note 8—Income
Taxes
For the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the effective tax rate for the
Company was 42.4% and 40.0%, respectively. For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007, the effective tax rate for the Company was
41.5% and 40.8%, respectively. The company’s effective tax rate is higher than
the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily as a result of state income taxes and
other non-deductible permanent differences.
In July
2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”), which
became effective for the Company on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 prescribes a
recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be
more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The
amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater
than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. As a result
of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized no material adjustment
in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits.
As of
September 30, 2008, the Company had no material unrecognized tax benefits,
interest or penalties related to various federal and state income tax matters.
The Company’s policy is to recognize accrued interest and penalties related to
unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense.
The
Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax, as well as income tax of foreign
and state tax jurisdictions. The Company is currently under audit by the
Internal Revenue Service for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company is
currently open to audit under the statute of limitations for the years ending
December 31, 2003 through 2007.
Note 9—Net
Income (Loss) Per Share
Net
income (loss) per share has been computed in accordance with SFAS 128. The following table sets
forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per
share:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Net
Income (Loss) Per Share
|
|
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(491 |
) |
|
$ |
894 |
|
|
$ |
(13,429 |
) |
|
$ |
1,901 |
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
common shares outstanding (basic)
|
|
|
29,846,757 |
|
|
|
29,837,538 |
|
|
|
29,876.757 |
|
|
|
27,744,016 |
|
Common
equivalent shares from conversion of preferred stock
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
947,608 |
|
Common
equivalent shares from common stock options and warrants
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
172,353 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
57,897 |
|
Weighted-average
common shares outstanding (diluted)
|
|
|
29,846,757 |
|
|
|
30,009,891 |
|
|
|
29,846,757 |
|
|
|
28,749,521 |
|
Basic
and diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.45 |
) |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
Note 10—Share-Based
Compensation
The
Company accounts for share-based compensation expense in accordance with SFAS
No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based
Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”), which was adopted on January 1, 2006. No
stock options were granted prior to January 1, 2006. All stock options
issued to employees are recognized as share-based compensation expense in the
financial statements based on their respective grant date fair values, and are
recognized within the statement of operations as general and administrative,
marketing, fulfillment or technology expense, based on employee departmental
classifications.
Under
SFAS 123(R), the fair value of each share-based payment award is estimated on
the date of grant using an option pricing model that meets certain requirements.
The Company currently uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate
the fair value of share-based payment awards, with the exception of options
granted containing market conditions, which the Company estimates the fair value
using a Monte-Carlo model. The determination of the fair value of share-based
payment awards utilizing the Black-Scholes and Monte-Carlo models is affected by
the Company’s stock price and a number of assumptions, including expected
volatility, expected life, risk-free interest rate and expected dividends. As of
September 30, 2008, the Company did not have an adequate history of market
prices of its common stock as the Company only recently became a public company
in February 2007, and as such, the Company estimates volatility in accordance
with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”) using historical
volatilities of similar public entities. The expected life of the awards is
based on a simplified method which defines the life as the average of the
contractual term of the options and the weighted average vesting period for all
open tranches. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based on observed
interest rates appropriate for the terms of awards. The dividend yield
assumption is based on the Company’s expectation of paying no dividends.
Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in
subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates.
For
non-employees, the Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance
with Emerging Issues Task Force No. 96-18, “Accounting
for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or
in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.” Equity instruments
awarded to non-employees are periodically remeasured as the underlying awards
vest unless the instruments are fully vested, immediately exercisable and
non-forfeitable on the date of grant.
Under
SFAS 123(R), forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if
necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates. Our estimated forfeiture rate was calculated based on
actual historical forfeitures experienced under our equity plans. In the third
quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company performed its periodic review of the
estimated forfeiture rate and based on turnover during the last twelve months,
adjusted the weighted-average forfeiture rate from 5% to 16.7%. This change in
estimated forfeiture rate was not material to the third quarter of 2008 but did
result in a decrease of approximately $2.9 million in share-based
compensation expense for the remaining weighted-average period. As of
September 30, 2008, there was $7.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense
related to stock options, which expense is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.7 years.
The
Company granted options to purchase up to 2,013,000 shares of its common stock
under the Company’s 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) at a
weighted-average exercise price of $3.63 per share during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. The intrinsic value of stock options at the date of exercise
is the difference between the fair value of the stock at the date of exercise
and the exercise price. During the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, there were no option exercises under the Plan. Aggregate intrinsic value
is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying
awards and the fair value price of the Company’s common stock for options that
were in-the-money as of September 30, 2008. No options outstanding at September
30, 2008 were in-the-money.
Note 11—Line
of Credit
At
September 30, 2008, the Company had no balance outstanding under its bank
line of credit, which expires on October 31, 2009. The credit
agreement contains customary covenants that, among other things, require
compliance with certain financial ratios and targets and restrict the incurrence
of additional indebtedness. As of September 30, 2008, the Company was
in violation of its minimum EBITDA requirement; however, it has
received a waiver from the lender.
ITEM 2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Cautionary
Statement
You
should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes
thereto contained in Part I, Item 1 of this Report. The information
contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is not a complete description of
our business or the risks associated with an investment in our common stock. We
urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in
this Report and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and subsequent reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K, which
discuss our business in greater detail. The section entitled “Risk Factors” set
forth below, and similar discussions in our other SEC filings, describe some of
the important risk factors that may affect our business, results of operations
and financial condition. You should carefully consider those risks, in addition
to the other information in this Report and in our other filings with the SEC,
before deciding to purchase, hold or sell our common stock.
Overview
We are a
leading online provider of aftermarket auto parts, including body parts, engine
parts and performance parts and accessories. Our user-friendly websites provide
customers with a broad selection of automotive parts, with detailed product
descriptions and photographs. Our proprietary product database maps our SKUs to
product applications based on vehicle makes, models and years. We principally
sell our products to individual consumers through our network of websites and
online marketplaces. Our flagship websites are located at www.partstrain.com and www.autopartswarehouse.com.
We believe our strategy of disintermediating the traditional auto parts supply
channels and selling products directly to customers over the Internet allows us
to more efficiently deliver products to our customers while generating higher
margins.
Our History. We were formed
in 1995 as a distributor of aftermarket auto parts and launched our first
website in 2000. We rapidly expanded our online operations, increasing the
number of SKUs sold through our e-commerce network, adding additional websites,
improving our Internet marketing proficiency and commencing sales in online
marketplaces. As a result, our business has grown significantly since 2000,
generating net sales of $161.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2007.
Partsbin Acquisition. In May
2006, we completed the acquisition of Partsbin. As a result of this acquisition,
we expanded our product offering and product catalog to include performance
parts and accessories and additional engine parts, enhanced our ability to reach
more customers, significantly increased our net sales and added a complementary,
drop-ship order fulfillment method. Partsbin also expanded our international
operations by adding a call center in the Philippines and an outsourced call
center in India, as well as a Canadian subsidiary to facilitate sales in Canada.
We also augmented our technology platform and expanded our management team. We
may pursue additional acquisition opportunities in the future to increase our
share of the aftermarket auto parts market or expand our product offerings.
International Operations.
Since 2003, we have maintained operations in the Philippines. As our
ability to manage offshore operations has improved, we have increased our
offshore capacity. In the Philippines, we operate a call
center, information systems, application and web development, category
management, and internet marketing, all supported by Philippine-based
accounting and human resources. In addition to our Philippines
operations, we have outsourced call center operations in India and own a
Canadian subsidiary to facilitate sales of our products in Canada. We
believe that the cost advantages of our offshore operations provide us with the
ability to grow our business in a cost-effective manner, and we expect to
continue to add headcount and infrastructure to our offshore
operations.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is
based upon our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have
been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of these unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we
evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition,
uncollectible receivables, intangible and other long-lived assets and
contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions. There were no significant changes to our critical accounting
policies during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, as
compared to those policies disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 except as noted below.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 157, “ Fair
Value Measurements ” (“SFAS 157”) which defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. We have adopted the provisions of
SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008 for financial assets. SFAS 157 establishes a
three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring
fair value. These tiers include: Level 1-defined as observable inputs such as
quoted prices in active markets; Level 2-defined as inputs other than quoted
prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and
Level 3-defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists,
therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. We have evaluated
both Level 2 and Level 3 evidence to measure the fair value of our $6.5 million
of auction rate preferred securities (“ARPS”) as of September 30, 2008. These
investments consist solely of collateralized debt obligations supported by
municipal and state agencies; do not include mortgage-backed securities or
student loans; have redemption features that call for redemption at 100% of par
value; and have a current credit rating of A or AAA. As of September 30, 2008,
we received partial redemptions at par on our investments totaling $1.3 million.
The fact that there is not an active market as of September 30, 2008 to
liquidate 100% of these certain investments was the final determination in
classifying them as Level 3. We used a discounted cash flow valuation model to
estimate the fair value of the securities. As a result of the temporary declines
in fair value of our ARPS, which we attribute to liquidity issues rather than
credit issues, we have recorded an unrealized loss of $149,000 to accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss).
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities“ (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits
companies to choose to measure at fair value certain financial instruments and
other items that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. SFAS
159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We adopted
SFAS 159 on January 1, 2008 and elected not to measure any additional financial
instruments or other items at fair value.
In
accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Intangible
Assets” (“SFAS 142”) and SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”), we recorded an
impairment charge totaling $18.4 million in the quarter ended June 30,
2008 on intangible assets associated with the Partsbin business,
which we acquired in May 2006. The impairment charge related to its
websites, software, vendor agreements and domain name intangible assets. The
interim impairment charge was primarily the result of: (i) the recent
deterioration in the economic environment and the Company’s stock price, (ii)
lower sales and profitability which generated losses from certain Partsbin
websites, (iii) deficiencies in the software platform also acquired from
Partsbin, and (iv) the termination of volume discounts and marketing co-ops from
certain vendor agreements. Given the indicators of impairment and the
excess of the carrying value over the undiscounted cash flows associated with
these intangibles, we utilized a discounted cash flow approach in determining
fair value for both the websites and vendor agreement intangible
assets. The decrease in future cash flows from certain acquired
websites and vendor agreements resulted in the long-lived assets being impaired,
as the carrying value of the website assets and vendor agreement assets
exceeded the fair value of those assets determined as the net present value of
future projected cash flows. The software and domain name assets’
fair value was determined using a relief from royalty approach, which also
resulted in a lower fair value than the carrying value of the
assets.
Results of
Operations
The
following table sets forth certain unaudited statements of operations data as a
% of net sales for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
% |
|
|
100.0
|
% |
|
|
100.0
|
% |
|
|
100.0
|
% |
|
|
|
67.0 |
|
|
|
63.8 |
|
|
|
66.2 |
|
|
|
66.7 |
|
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Amortization
of intangibles
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
|
53.1 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Income
(loss) from operations
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
(19.3 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
|
2.6 |
|
Income
tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
)
% |
|
|
2.4
|
% |
|
|
(11.2 |
)
% |
|
|
1.5
|
% |
Net
Sales and Gross Margin
|
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
36,554
|
|
|
$
|
37,787
|
|
|
$
|
119,668
|
|
|
$
|
123,642
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
24,485
|
|
|
|
24,096
|
|
|
|
79,262
|
|
|
|
82,497
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
$
|
12,069
|
|
|
$
|
13,691
|
|
|
$
|
40,406
|
|
|
$
|
41,145
|
|
Gross
margin
|
|
|
33.0%
|
|
|
|
36.2%
|
|
|
|
33.8%
|
|
|
|
33.3%
|
|
Net sales
decreased 3.3% to $36.6 million and decreased 3.2% to $119.7 million for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to the
same periods in the previous year. The three month year-over-year
decrease was primarily due to a $1.0 million or 26.6% decrease in our offline
business, which consists of our Kool Vue and wholesale
operations. The nine month year-over-year decrease was due to 2.4%
decrease in our online business and a 10.8% decrease in our offline business.
Our online business consists of two sales channels, e-commerce and online
marketplaces. Our e-commerce channel includes a network of e-commerce
websites supported by our call-center sales agents who generate cross-sell and
up-sell opportunities. Our online marketplaces consist primarily of auction and
other third-party websites.
E-commerce
sales decreased 3.2% to $28.6 million for the three months ended September 30,
2008 from $29.5 million for the prior year period. This decrease is primarily
due to a decline of 6,000 placed orders in our e-commerce channel over the
prior-year period and a $6 decrease in our average order value to $121 for the
third quarter of 2008 from $127 in the third quarter of 2007. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, e-commerce sales were $92.9
million and $95.4 million, respectively. The 2.6% decrease was
primarily due to a $4 decrease in average order value compared to the prior-year
period.
Online
marketplaces sales increased 14.5% to $5.3 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 from $4.6 million for the same period in the prior
year. This increase was primarily due to increased sales on our
auction platform. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and 2007, online marketplaces sales were $16.2 million and $16.4 million,
respectively.
Net sales
from our offline business decreased 26.6% to $2.7 million and 10.8% to $10.6
million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to the
same periods in the prior year. This decrease in net sales is
primarily due to reduced purchases from a significant customer in the second and
third quarters of 2008. We anticipate that sales from our wholesale
operations will continue to decline as a percentage of net sales in the
future.
We have
historically experienced seasonality in our business, which generally has
resulted in higher sales in winter and summer months. We expect seasonality to
continue in future years as automobile collisions during inclement weather
create increased demand for body parts in winter months, and consumers often
undertake projects to maintain and enhance the performance of their automobiles
in the summer months. We anticipate that seasonality will continue to have a
material impact on our financial condition and results of operations during any
given year.
Gross
profit was $12.1 million or 33.0% of net sales and $40.4 million or 33.8% of net
sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $13.7
million or 36.2% of net sales and $41.1 million or 33.3% of net sales in the
same periods in the prior year. The decrease of 3.2% in gross margins for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior
year was primarily due to higher fuel costs and third party shipping costs,
higher raw material costs, and lower vendor rebates. The 0.5%
increase in gross margins for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared
to the same periods in the prior year was primarily due to a mix-shift to in
stock distribution, partially offset by higher outbound freight
costs.
General
and Administrative Expense
|
|
Three
Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
General
and administrative expense
|
|
$
|
4,170
|
|
|
$
|
3,184
|
|
|
$
|
13,381
|
|
|
$
|
9,715
|
|
Percent
of net sales
|
|
|
11.4%
|
|
|
|
8.4%
|
|
|
|
11.2%
|
|
|
|
7.9%
|
|
General
and administrative expense increased $1.0 million or 31.0% and $3.7 million or
37.7% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, from the same
periods in the previous year. The increase for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 primarily reflects $400,000 higher payroll related costs;
$300,000 of increased amortization expense; a $200,000 increase in share-based
compensation expense; and $100,000 of additional professional
fees. The increase for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
primarily reflects $1.5 million higher payroll costs; $800,000 of increased
professional fees and public company operating expenses; $800.000 of higher
amortization expense; and $300,000 of increased share-based
compensation expense.
During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized $800,000 and
$2.1 million, respectively, of share-based compensation, determined in
accordance with SFAS 123(R). Based on options outstanding as of September 30,
2008, we expect to recognize $7.1 million in additional share-based compensation
expense over a weighted average period of 2.7 years.
Marketing
Expense
|
|
Three
Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Marketing
expense
|
|
$
|
5,240
|
|
|
$
|
4,917
|
|
|
$
|
17,842
|
|
|
$
|
15,738
|
|
Percent
of net sales
|
|
|
14.3%
|
|
|
|
13.0%
|
|
|
|
14.9%
|
|
|
|
12.7%
|
|
Marketing expense increased $300,000 or
6.6% and $2.1 million or 13.4% for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, from the same periods in the previous year. As a percentage of
net sales, marketing expense increased 1.3% to 14.3% for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to the prior-year period primarily due to higher
depreciation expense related to the expansion of our offshore
facilities. As a percentage of net sales, marketing expense increased
2.2% to 14.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the
prior-year period primarily due to $1.3 million of increased personnel
costs in our offshore operations; partially offset by the elimination of our
U.S. based call center costs; and $600,000 of higher depreciation
expense.
Fulfillment
Expense
|
|
Three
Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Fulfillment
expense
|
|
$
|
2,322
|
|
|
$
|
1,920
|
|
|
$
|
6,787
|
|
|
$
|
5,499
|
|
Percent
of net sales
|
|
|
6.4%
|
|
|
|
5.1%
|
|
|
|
5.7%
|
|
|
|
4.4%
|
|
Fulfillment
expense increased $400,000 or 20.9% and $1.3 million or 23.4% for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, from the same periods in the previous
year. As a percentage of net sales, fulfillment expense increased
1.3% to 6.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the
prior-year period primarily due to $100,000 of additional payroll related costs;
a $200,000 increase in our fulfillment center costs; and $100,000 higher
depreciation expense. As a percentage of net sales, fulfillment
expense increased 1.3% to 5.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
compared to the prior-year period primarily due to $600,000 in payroll costs; a
$300,000 increase in our fulfillment center costs; and $400,000 of
higher depreciation expense.
Technology
Expense
|
|
Three
Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Technology
expense
|
|
$
|
1,041
|
|
|
$
|
438
|
|
|
$
|
2,512
|
|
|
$
|
1,394
|
|
Percent
of net sales
|
|
|
2.8%
|
|
|
|
1.2%
|
|
|
|
2.1%
|
|
|
|
1.1%
|
|
Technology
expense increased 137.7% to $1.0 million and increased 80.2% to $2.5
million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively. The increase in both periods was due to increased
investments in our technology platform with increased headcount and third-party
service providers.
Amortization of Intangibles and
Impairment Loss
|
|
Three
Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Amortization
of intangibles and impairment loss
|
|
$
|
365
|
|
|
$
|
2,097
|
|
|
$
|
23,005
|
|
|
$
|
6,251
|
|
Percent
of net sales
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
|
5.5%
|
|
|
|
19.2%
|
|
|
|
5.1%
|
|
Amortization
of intangibles and impairment loss decreased $1.7 million or 82.6% for the three
months ended September 30, 2008 and increased by $16.8 million to $23.0 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily due to lower
pre-tax income from the prior year period. The increase for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily due to a non-cash impairment
charge in the second quarter of 2008 totaling $18.4 million on intangible assets
associated with the Partsbin business, which we acquired in May
2006. For further discussion, refer to our SFAS 144 disclosure in the
Critical Accounting Policies section. We estimate aggregate
amortization expense for the remaining three months ending December 31, 2008,
and the years ending December 31, 2009, 2010, 2011 and thereafter to be
approximately $400,000, $700,000, $300,000, $300,000 and $400,000,
respectively.
Other Income
|
|
Three
Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Other
income
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
|
$
|
392
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
662
|
|
Percent
of net sales
|
|
|
0.6%
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
|
0.6%
|
|
|
|
0.5%
|
|
The
decrease in other income during the three months ended September 30, 2008 was
primarily due to $200,000 lower interest income related to lower interest
rates in the third quarter of 2008 compared to the prior year period. The
increase in other income during the nine months ended September 30, 2008
compared to the prior-year period was primarily due to interest income generated
from investing the IPO proceeds, which was partially offset by a $600,000
reduction of interest expense due to the repayment of approximately $28.0
million of our long-term indebtedness upon completion of our initial public
offering in February 2007.
Income Tax Provision
(Benefit)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Income
tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(362)
|
|
|
$
|
633
|
|
|
$
|
(8,968)
|
|
|
$
|
1,309
|
|
Percent
of net sales
|
|
|
(1.0%)
|
|
|
|
1.6%
|
|
|
|
(7.5%)
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
The
decrease in income tax provision (benefit) during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 was primarily due to the tax effect of the $18.4
million impairment loss on our intangible assets. This is a temporary
timing difference as we expect to reduce our cash paid for taxes over the
remaining asset life of twelve years for tax purposes.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Sources
of Liquidity
We have
historically funded our operations from cash generated from operations, credit
facilities, bank loans, equity financings and capital lease financings. At
September 30, 2008, we had no balance outstanding under our bank line of credit,
which expires on October 31, 2009. The credit agreement contains
customary covenants that, among other things, require compliance with certain
financial ratios and targets and restrict the incurrence of additional
indebtedness. As of September 30, 2008, we were in violation of our
minimum EBITDA requirement; however, we have received a waiver from our
lender.
Cash
Flows
We had
cash and cash equivalents of $33.1 million as of September 30, 2008,
representing a $9.0 million decrease from $42.1 million of liquid assets as of
December 31, 2007. The decrease in our cash and cash equivalents as of
September 30, 2008 was primarily due to a reclassification of $6.4 million of
our investments in ARPS to long-term and a $3.4 million payment related to our
securities litigation settlement in July 2008.
Operating
Activities
We
generated $1.9 million of net cash from operating activities for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. The significant components of cash flows from
operating activities were a net loss of $13.4 million; an increase of $8.9
million in deferred tax assets primarily related to the tax benefit from the
impairment loss on our intangibles; an increase of $0.9 million to our
inventory; a $2.6 million net change in other current assets and liabilities,
which primarily relates to the $3.4 million settlement in our securities class
action litigation; offset by $7.2 million in non-cash depreciation and
amortization expense; $18.4 million of a non-cash impairment loss on
intangibles; and $2.1 million of non-cash stock-based compensation
expense.
Investing
Activities
Cash
provided by investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2008
totaled $12.8 million and was primarily attributable to our net change in
investments of $16.2 million in ARPS and purchases of $2.9 million of property
and equipment.
Financing
Activities
Cash used
in financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 totaled
$1.0 million and was primarily due to repayments made on notes
payable.
Funding
Requirements
We had
working capital of $36.1 million as of September 30, 2008, which was primarily
due to the cash generated from our initial public offering. The historical
seasonality in our business during the first and fourth calendar quarters of
each year cause cash and cash equivalents, inventory and accounts payable to be
generally higher in these quarters, resulting in seasonal fluctuations in our
working capital. We anticipate that funds generated from operations, and cash on
hand will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs and expected capital
expenditures for at least the next twelve months. Our future capital
requirements may, however, vary materially from those now planned or
anticipated. Changes in our operating plans, lower than anticipated net sales,
increased expenses or other events, including those described in “Risk Factors,”
may cause us to seek additional debt or equity financings in the future.
Financing may not be available on acceptable terms, on a timely basis, or at
all, and our failure to raise adequate capital when needed could negatively
impact our growth plans and our financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, our $6.4 million of ARPS investments as of September 30, 2008 were
classified as long-term investments as a result of failed auctions and liquidity
issues and we may not have access to those funds.
We are
currently planning on opening a new distribution center on the east coast which
would result in a significant capital investment. We expect to incur
approximately $2.0 million in facility start-up costs which includes a new
warehouse technology platform and up to an additional $3.0 million in
inventory. We are also accelerating our technology investments in an
effort to improve our websites, operating systems and backend
platforms. We anticipate these decisions will increase our technology
costs as a percentage of sales as well as increase our capitalized software and
website development costs over the next several quarters.
Seasonality
We
believe our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations, generally resulting in
higher sales in the winter and summer months. We have historically experienced
higher sales of body parts in winter months when inclement weather and hazardous
road conditions typically result in more automobile collisions. Engine parts and
performance parts and accessories have historically experienced higher sales in
the summer months when consumers have more time to undertake elective projects
to maintain and enhance the performance of their automobiles and the warmer
weather during that time is conducive for such projects. We expect the
historical seasonality trends to continue to have a material impact on our
financial condition and results of operations in any given year.
Inflation
Inflation
has not had a material impact upon our operating results to date, and we do not
expect it to have such an impact in the near future. We cannot assure you that
our business will not be affected by inflation in the future. We have
experienced gross margin pressure from rising fuel costs, steel costs, and other
component material.
ITEM 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
|
We do not
use financial instruments for trading purposes, and do not hold any derivative
financial instruments that could expose us to significant market risk. Our
primary market risk exposure with regard to financial instruments is changes in
interest rates. We also have some risk related to foreign currency
fluctuations.
Interest Rate Risk. All of
our investments are classified as available-for-sale and therefore reported on
the balance sheet at market value. Our investment securities consist of
high-grade ARPS. As of September 30, 2008, our long-term investments included
$6.4 million of investments in ARPS, which consist of high-grade (A or AAA
rated) collateralized debt obligations issued by municipal and state agencies.
Our ARPS have an interest rate that is reset in short intervals through
auctions. The recent conditions in the global credit markets have prevented some
investors from liquidating their holdings of ARPS because the amount of
securities submitted for sale has exceeded the amount of purchase orders for
these securities. If there is insufficient demand for the securities at the time
of an auction, the auction may not be completed and the interest rates may be
reset to predetermined higher rates. When auctions for these securities fail,
the investments may not be readily convertible to cash until a future auction of
these investments is successful or they are redeemed or mature. If the credit
ratings of the security issuers deteriorate and any decline in market value is
determined to be other-than-temporary, we would be required to adjust the
carrying value of the investment through an impairment charge.
On
February 13, 2008, we were informed that there was insufficient demand at
auctions for four of our high-grade ARPS, representing approximately $7.8
million. As a result, these affected securities are currently not liquid and the
interest rates have been reset to the predetermined higher rates. As of
September 30, 2008, we received partial redemptions at par on all four ARPS
totaling $1.3 million with a remaining principal balance on our ARPS of $6.5
million.
In the
event we need to access the funds that are in an illiquid state, we will not be
able to do so without the possible loss of principal, until a future auction for
these investments is successful or they are redeemed by the issuer. At this
time, management has not obtained sufficient evidence to conclude that these
investments are impaired or that they will not be settled in the short term,
although the market for these investments is presently uncertain. If we are
unable to sell these securities in the market or they are not redeemed, then we
may be required to hold them indefinitely. We do not have a need to access these
funds for operational purposes for the foreseeable future. We will continue to
monitor and evaluate these investments on an ongoing basis for impairment or for
a short-term to long-term reclassification. Based on our ability to access our
cash and other short-term investments, our expected cash flows, and our other
sources of cash, we do not anticipate that the potential illiquidity of these
investments will affect our ability to execute our current business
plan. However, due to the illiquidity of the market, we have recorded
$149,000 of unrealized losses on our investment portfolio as of September 30,
2008.
Pursuant
to the terms of our line of credit with our principal lender, changes in the
prime rate or monthly LIBOR rate could affect the rates at which we could borrow
funds under our line of credit. At September 30, 2008, we had no outstanding
borrowings under our line of credit with this lender.
Foreign Currency Risk. Our
purchases of auto parts from our Asian suppliers are denominated in U.S. dollars
and a change in the foreign currency exchange rates could impact our product
costs over time. Our financial reporting currency is the U.S. Dollar and changes
in exchange rates significantly affect our reported results and consolidated
trends. For example, if the U.S. Dollar weakens year-over-year relative to
currencies in our international locations, our consolidated net sales, gross
profit, and operating expenses will be higher than if currencies had remained
constant. Likewise, if the U.S. Dollar strengthens year-over-year relative to
currencies in our international locations, our consolidated net sales, gross
profit, and operating expenses will be lower than if currencies had remained
constant. Our operating expenses in the Philippines are generally paid in
Philippine Pesos and as the exchange rate fluctuates, it adversely or favorably
impacts our operating results. In light of the above, we believe that a
fluctuation of 10% in the Peso/U.S. Dollar exchange rate would have
approximately a $600,000 impact on our operating expenses for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. Our Canadian website sales are denominated
in Canadian Dollars; however, fluctuations in exchange rates from these
operations would have only a nominal impact on our operating
results. We also believe it is important to evaluate our operating
results and growth rates before and after the effect of currency
changes.
ITEM 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the
end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation required
by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”), under the supervision
and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the 1934
Act.
Disclosure
controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance that information required
to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the 1934 Act
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and to provide reasonable assurance that
such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including
our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Based on
this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the
reasonable assurance level because of the identification of certain material
weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, as described in our
2007 Form 10-K, which we view as an integral part of our disclosures controls
and procedures.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During
the most recent fiscal quarter, no change in our internal control over financial
reporting has occurred that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
However,
to address the identified material weakness, we are in the process of
implementing remediation plans, including the following:
|
•
|
|
We
hired several key accounting and SOX professionals during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008.
|
|
•
|
|
We
hired additional information technology management who are documenting and
testing our information technology general
controls.
|
|
•
|
|
We
are completing our documentation of policies and procedures, and are in
the process of testing our key
controls.
|
Inherent
Limitations on Internal Controls
Our
disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance
of achieving their objectives as specified above. Management does not expect,
however, that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent or detect all
error and fraud. Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated,
is based upon certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurance that its objectives will be met. Further, no evaluation of controls
can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not
occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
Company have been detected.
PART
II. Other Information
ITEM 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
The
information set forth under Note 5 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements, included in Part I, Item I of this report, is incorporated
herein by reference.
Before
deciding to purchase, hold or sell our common stock, you should carefully
consider the risks described below in addition to the other cautionary
statements and risks described elsewhere, and the other information contained,
in this report and in our other filings with the SEC, including our subsequent
reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, and any amendments thereto. The risks and
uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks
and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial
may also affect our business. If any of these known or unknown risks or
uncertainties actually occurs with material adverse effects on us, our business,
financial condition, results of operations and/or liquidity could be seriously
harmed. In that event, the market price for our common stock will likely decline
and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related To Our
Business
Purchasers
of aftermarket auto parts may not choose to shop online, which would prevent us
from acquiring new customers who are necessary to the growth of our
business.
The
online market for aftermarket auto parts is less developed than the online
market for many other business and consumer products. Our success will depend in
part on our ability to attract new customers and customers who have historically
purchased auto parts through traditional retail and wholesale operations.
Furthermore, we may have to incur significantly higher and more sustained
advertising and marketing expenditures or may need to price our products more
competitively than we currently anticipate in order to attract additional online
consumers and convert them into purchasing customers. Specific factors that
could prevent prospective customers from purchasing from us
include:
|
•
|
|
concerns
about buying auto parts without face-to-face interaction with sales
personnel;
|
|
•
|
|
the
inability to physically handle, examine and compare
products;
|
|
•
|
|
delivery
time associated with Internet
orders;
|
|
•
|
|
concerns
about the security of online transactions and the privacy of personal
information;
|
|
•
|
|
delayed
shipments or shipments of incorrect or damaged
products;
|
|
•
|
|
increased
shipping costs; and
|
|
•
|
|
the
inconvenience associated with returning or exchanging items purchased
online.
|
If the
online market for auto parts does not gain widespread acceptance, our sales may
decline and our business and financial results may suffer.
We
depend on search engines and other online sources to attract visitors to our
websites, and if we are unable to attract these visitors and convert them into
customers in a cost-effective manner, our business and results of operations
will be harmed.
Our
success depends on our ability to attract online consumers to our websites and
convert them into customers in a cost-effective manner. We are significantly
dependent upon search engines, shopping comparison sites and other online
sources for our website traffic. We are included in search results as a result
of both paid search listings, where we purchase specific search terms that will
result in the inclusion of our listing, and algorithmic searches that depend
upon the searchable content on our sites. Algorithmic listings cannot be
purchased and instead are determined and displayed solely by a set of formulas
utilized by the search engine. We rely on both algorithmic and purchased
listings to attract and direct consumers to our websites. Search engines,
shopping comparison sites and other online sources revise their algorithms from
time to time in an attempt to optimize their search results. Recently, Google
changed its algorithm for natural search which significantly reduced traffic to
many of our websites. If one or more of the search engines, shopping comparison
sites or other online sources on which we rely for website traffic were to
modify its general methodology for how it displays or selects our websites,
resulting in fewer consumers clicking through to our websites, our financial
results could be adversely affected. We operate a multiple website platform that
generally allows us to provide multiple search results for a particular
algorithmic search. If the search engines were to limit our display results to a
single result or entirely eliminate our results from the algorithmic search, our
website traffic would significantly decrease and our business would be
materially harmed. If any free search engine or shopping comparison site on
which we rely begins charging fees for listing or placement, or if one or more
of the search engines, shopping comparison sites and other online sources on
which we rely for purchased listings, modifies or terminates its relationship
with us, our expenses could rise, we could lose customers and traffic to our
websites could decrease. In addition, our success in attracting visitors who
convert to customers will depend in part upon our ability to identify and
purchase relevant search terms, provide relevant content on our sites, and
effectively target our other marketing programs such as e-mail campaigns and
affiliate programs. If we are unable to attract visitors to our websites and
convert them to customers in a cost-effective manner, then our sales may decline
and our business and financial results may be harmed.
Future
acquisitions could disrupt our business and harm our financial
condition.
As part
of our growth strategy, we expect that we will selectively pursue acquisitions
of businesses, technologies or services in order to expand our capabilities,
enter new markets or increase our market share. Integrating any newly acquired
businesses’ websites, technologies or services is likely to be expensive and
time consuming. For example, our acquisition of Partsbin has resulted in
significant costs, including a material impairment charge, and a number of
challenges, including retaining employees of the acquired company, integrating
our order processing and credit processing, integrating our product pricing
strategy, and integrating the diverse technologies and differing e-commerce
platforms and accounting systems used by each company. If we are unable to
successfully complete the integration of acquisitions, we may not realize the
synergies from such acquisition, and our business and results of operations
could suffer. To finance any future acquisitions, it may also be necessary for
us to raise additional capital through public or private financings. Additional
funds may not be available on terms that are favorable to us, and, in the case
of equity financings, would result in dilution to our stockholders. Future
acquisitions by us could also result in large and immediate write-offs,
assumption of debt and unforeseen liabilities and significant adverse accounting
charges, any of which could substantially harm our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Our
integration of Partsbin has been time consuming and expensive, and may continue
to negatively impact our business.
In May
2006, we completed the acquisition of Partsbin, an online retailer of
aftermarket auto parts. As a result of the acquisition, we added 47 employees,
and our available SKUs and net sales increased significantly. The acquisition of
Partsbin has involved significant costs, has resulted in challenges integrating
the diverse technologies used by each company and has placed, and may continue
to place, pressures on our operational and financial infrastructure. We cannot
assure you that our current cost structure or infrastructure will be adequate
for the combined companies. We need to continue to improve our operational and
financial systems, procedures and controls and maintain our cost structure at
appropriate levels.
The
Partsbin acquisition also expanded our product offerings, particularly in the
area of engine parts and performance parts and accessories, and significantly
increased our use of drop-ship as a method of fulfillment. We cannot assure you
that we can effectively manage this new fulfillment model or address the market
for these additional auto parts.
The
integration of Partsbin has, and may continue to, involve the consolidation of
diverse business cultures and technology infrastructures, require substantial
time and expenses, and distract management from other business matters. In early
2007, we discovered some integration issues related to the Partsbin acquisition
that were largely related to lower than expected order fill rates from drop-ship
vendors in the fourth quarter of 2006 and lower pricing levels on our
performance parts and accessories product category in the first quarter of 2007,
which negatively impacted our gross margins during 2007. In addition, this
acquisition included significant intangible assets that are subject to periodic
impairment testing which in the second quarter of 2008 resulted in an impairment
charge in the amount of the total intangible asset related to the acquisition.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to adequately address these or other
integration issues related to this acquisition.
If
we are unable to manage the challenges associated with our international
operations, the growth of our business could be limited and our business could
suffer.
|
•
|
|
difficulties
and costs of staffing and managing foreign
operations;
|
|
•
|
|
restrictions
imposed by local labor practices and laws on our business and
operations;
|
|
•
|
|
exposure
to different business practices and legal
standards;
|
|
•
|
|
unexpected
changes in regulatory requirements;
|
|
•
|
|
the
imposition of government controls and
restrictions;
|
|
•
|
|
political,
social and economic instability and the risk of war, terrorist activities
or other international incidents;
|
|
•
|
|
the
failure of telecommunications and connectivity
infrastructure;
|
|
•
|
|
natural
disasters and public health
emergencies;
|
|
•
|
|
potentially
adverse tax consequences;
|
|
•
|
|
the
failure of local laws to provide a sufficient degree of protection against
infringement of our intellectual property;
and
|
|
•
|
|
fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates and relative weakness in the U.S.
dollar.
|
We
are dependent upon relationships with suppliers in Taiwan, China and the United
States for the vast majority of our products.
We
acquire substantially all of our products from manufacturers and distributors
located in Taiwan, China and the United States. Our top ten suppliers
represented approximately 60.6% of our total product purchases during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008. We do not have any long-term contracts or
exclusive agreements with our foreign suppliers that would ensure our ability to
acquire the types and quantities of products we desire at acceptable prices and
in a timely manner. We continue to enter into supply agreements with our
U.S. based suppliers and our primary drop-ship vendors. In addition, our
ability to acquire products from our suppliers in amounts and on terms
acceptable to us is dependent upon a number of factors that could affect our
suppliers and which are beyond our control. For example, financial or
operational difficulties that some of our suppliers may face could result in an
increase in the cost of the products we purchase from them. In addition, the
increasing consolidation among auto parts suppliers may disrupt or end our
relationship with some suppliers, result in product shortages and/or could lead
to less competition and, consequently, higher prices.
In
addition, because many of our suppliers are outside of the United States,
additional factors could interrupt our relationships or affect our ability to
acquire the necessary products on acceptable terms, including:
|
•
|
|
political,
social and economic instability and the risk of war or other international
incidents in Asia or abroad;
|
|
•
|
|
fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates that may increase our cost of
products;
|
|
•
|
|
tariffs
and protectionist laws and business practices that favor local
businesses;
|
|
•
|
|
difficulties
in complying with import and export laws, regulatory requirements and
restrictions; and
|
|
•
|
|
natural
disasters and public health
emergencies.
|
If we do
not maintain our relationships with our existing suppliers or develop
relationships with new suppliers on acceptable commercial terms, we may not be
able to continue to offer a broad selection of merchandise at competitive prices
and, as a result, we could lose customers and our sales could
decline.
We
are dependent upon third parties for distribution and fulfillment operations
with respect to many of our products.
For a
number of the products that we sell, we outsource the distribution and
fulfillment operation and are dependent on our distributors to manage inventory,
process orders and distribute those products to our customers in a timely
manner. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, our product purchases from
a single supplier represented 14.7% or more of our total product purchases. If
we do not maintain our existing relationships with our distributors on
acceptable commercial terms, we will need to obtain other suppliers and may not
be able to continue to offer a broad selection of merchandise at competitive
prices, and our sales may decrease.
In
addition, because we outsource to distributors a number of these traditional
retail functions relating to those products, we have limited control over how
and when orders are fulfilled. We also have limited control over the products
that our distributors purchase or keep in stock. Our distributors may not
accurately forecast the products that will be in high demand or they may
allocate popular products to other resellers, resulting in the unavailability of
certain products for delivery to our customers. Any inability to offer a broad
array of products at competitive prices and any failure to deliver those
products to our customers in a timely and accurate manner may damage our
reputation and brand and could cause us to lose customers.
We
depend on third-party delivery services to deliver our products to our customers
on a timely and consistent basis, and any deterioration in our relationship with
any one of these third parties or increases in the fees that they charge could
adversely affect our business and financial condition.
We rely
on third parties for the shipment of our products and we cannot be sure that
these relationships will continue on terms favorable to us, or at all. Shipping
costs have increased from time to time, and may continue to increase, which
could harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of
operations by increasing our costs of doing business and resulting in reduced
gross margins. In addition, if our relationships with these third parties are
terminated or impaired, or if these third parties are unable to deliver products
for us, whether through labor shortage, slow down or stoppage, deteriorating
financial or business condition, responses to terrorist attacks or for any other
reason, we would be required to use alternative carriers for the shipment of
products to our customers. Changing carriers could have a negative effect on our
business and operating results due to reduced visibility of order status and
package tracking and delays in order processing and product delivery, and we may
be unable to engage alternative carriers on a timely basis, upon terms favorable
to us, or at all.
If
commodity prices such as fuel, plastic and steel continue to increase, our
margins may shrink.
Our third party delivery services
have increased fuel surcharges that have negatively impacted our margins, as we
have been unable to pass all of these costs directly to consumers. Increasing
prices in the component materials for the parts we sell may impact the
availability, the quality and the price of our products, as suppliers search for
alternatives to existing materials and as they increase the prices they charge.
We cannot ensure that we can recover all the increased costs through price
increases, our suppliers may not continue to provide the consistent quality of
product as they may substitute lower cost materials to maintain pricing levels,
all of which may have a negative impact on our business and results of
operations.
If
our fulfillment operations are interrupted for any significant period of time or
are not sufficient to accommodate increased demand, our sales would decline and
our reputation could be harmed.
Our
success depends on our ability to successfully receive and fulfill orders and to
promptly deliver our products to our customers. The majority of orders for our
auto body parts products are filled from our inventory in our distribution
centers, where all our inventory management, packaging, labeling and product
return processes are performed. Increased demand and other considerations may
require us to expand our distribution centers or transfer our fulfillment
operations to larger facilities in the future.
Our
distribution centers are susceptible to damage or interruption from human error,
fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications failures, terrorist attacks, acts of
war, break-ins, earthquakes and similar events. We do not currently maintain
back-up power systems at our fulfillment centers. We do not presently have a
formal disaster recovery plan and our business interruption insurance may be
insufficient to compensate us for losses that may occur in the event operations
at our fulfillment center are interrupted. Any interruptions in our fulfillment
operations for any significant period of time, including interruptions resulting
from the expansion of our existing facilities or the transfer of operations to a
new facility, could damage our reputation and brand and substantially harm our
business and results of operations. In addition, if we do not successfully
expand our fulfillment capabilities in response to increases in demand, we may
not be able to substantially increase our net sales.
We
rely on bandwidth and data center providers and other third parties to provide
products to our customers, and any failure or interruption in the services
provided by these third parties could disrupt our business and cause us to lose
customers.
We rely
on third-party vendors, including data center and bandwidth providers. Any
disruption in the network access or co-location services, which are the services
that house and provide Internet access to our servers, provided by these
third-party providers or any failure of these third-party providers to handle
current or higher volumes of use could significantly harm our business. Any
financial or other difficulties our providers face may have negative effects on
our business, the nature and extent of which we cannot predict. We exercise
little control over these third-party vendors, which increases our vulnerability
to problems with the services they provide. We also license technology and
related databases from third parties to facilitate elements of our e-commerce
platform. We have experienced and expect to continue to experience interruptions
and delays in service and availability for these elements. Any errors, failures,
interruptions or delays experienced in connection with these third-party
technologies could negatively impact our relationship with our customers and
adversely affect our business.
Our
systems also heavily depend on the availability of electricity, which also comes
from third-party providers. If we were to experience a major power outage, we
would have to rely on back-up generators. These back-up generators may not
operate properly through a major power outage, and their fuel supply could also
be inadequate during a major power outage. Information systems such as ours may
be disrupted by even brief power outages, or by the fluctuations in power
resulting from switches to and from backup generators. This could disrupt our
business and cause us to lose customers.
We
face intense competition and operate in an industry with limited barriers to
entry, and some of our competitors may have greater resources than us and may be
better positioned to capitalize on the growing e-commerce auto parts
market.
The auto
parts industry is competitive and highly fragmented, with products distributed
through multi-tiered and overlapping channels. We compete with both online and
offline retailers who offer OEM and aftermarket auto parts to either the
do-it-yourself or do-it-for-me customer segments. Current or potential
competitors include the following:
|
•
|
|
national
auto parts retailers such as Advance Auto Parts, AutoZone, CSK Auto, Napa
Auto Parts, O’Reilly Automotive and Pep
Boys;
|
|
•
|
|
large
online marketplaces such as Amazon.com and
eBay;
|
|
•
|
|
local
independent retailers or niche auto parts online retailers;
and
|
|
•
|
|
wholesale
auto parts distributors such as LKQ
Corporation.
|
Barriers
to entry are low, and current and new competitors can launch websites at a
relatively low cost. Many of our current and potential offline competitors have
longer operating histories, larger customer bases, greater brand recognition and
significantly greater financial, marketing, technical, management and other
resources than we do. In addition, some of our competitors have used and may
continue to use aggressive pricing tactics and devote substantially more
financial resources to website and system development than we do. We expect that
competition will further intensify in the future as Internet use and online
commerce continue to grow worldwide. Increased competition may result in reduced
operating margins, reduced profitability, loss of market share and diminished
brand recognition.
We would
also experience significant competitive pressure if any of our suppliers were to
sell their products directly to customers. Since our suppliers have access to
merchandise at very low costs, they could sell products at lower prices and
maintain higher gross margins on their product sales than we can. In this event,
our current and potential customers may decide to purchase directly from these
suppliers. Increased competition from any supplier capable of maintaining high
sales volumes and acquiring products at lower prices than us could significantly
reduce our market share and adversely impact our financial results.
Our
ability to sustain or increase our profitability will suffer if we fail to
manage our growth effectively.
In recent
years, we have experienced rapid growth that has placed, and may continue to
place, pressures on our operational and financial infrastructure. Our workforce
has increased from 114 employees as of December 31, 2003 to 824
employees as of September 30, 2008. Our net sales have increased from $31.7
million in 2003 to $161.0 million in 2007. Our recent expansion and planned
growth have placed, and are expected to continue to place, a strain on our
infrastructure, operations and managerial resources. We intend to further
increase the size of our operations, and we expect our operating expenses to
increase, as we, among other things:
|
•
|
|
expand
our domestic and international
operations;
|
|
•
|
|
add
additional distribution facilities;
|
|
•
|
|
increase
our technology and development efforts to enhance and maintain our
websites and technology
infrastructure;
|
|
•
|
|
hire
additional personnel, including customer service specialists, sales and
marketing professionals and financial
professionals;
|
|
•
|
|
upgrade
our operational and financial systems, procedures and controls;
and
|
|
•
|
|
address
the responsibilities and costs of being a public company, including costs
of complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
Our
success depends upon our ability to manage our operations and our growth
effectively. To be successful, we will need to improve our operational and
financial systems, procedures and controls, maintain our cost structure at
appropriate levels, manage international operations, and hire additional
personnel. We cannot assure you that our efforts will be successful or that we
can improve our systems, procedures and controls in a timely manner. Delays or
problems associated with any improvements or expansion of our systems,
procedures and controls could harm our business and operating results. In
addition, we may fail to accurately estimate and assess our increased operating
expenses as we grow. As our operating expenses increase, we will need to grow
our revenue in order to maintain our profitability.
Challenges
by Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”) to the validity of the aftermarket
auto parts industry and claims of intellectual property infringement could
adversely affect our business and the viability of the aftermarket auto parts
industry.
Original
equipment manufacturers have attempted to use claims of intellectual property
infringement against manufacturers and distributors of aftermarket products to
restrict or eliminate the sale of aftermarket products that are the subject of
the claims. The OEM’s have brought such claims in federal court and with the
United States International Trade Commission. We have received in the past, and
we anticipate we may in the future receive, communications alleging that certain
products we sell infringe the patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade names or
other intellectual property rights of OEM’s or other third
parties. For instance, in December 2005, Ford Global Technologies,
LLC initiated a complaint with the International Trade Commission against six
companies, including us, alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into
the United States infringed on 14 design patents held by Ford Global. Ford also
sought a permanent order directing us and the other respondents to cease and
desist from, among other things, selling, marketing, advertising, distributing
and offering for sale imported auto parts that infringe the design patents. In
December 2006, an administrative law judge of the International Trade Commission
preliminarily ruled that seven of the Ford Global design patents were valid and
that the importation of automotive parts covered by these seven patents violated
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The International Trade Commission
affirmed the ruling of the administrative law judge and issued an order
prohibiting further importation of automotive parts covered by the patents. The
parties to the action have appealed the decision to the United States Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On October 17, 2008, the parties
finished briefing the appeal. The federal circuit will likely hear
oral arguments from the parties during the first half of 2009.
The
United States Patent and Trademark Office records indicate that OEMs are seeking
and obtaining more design patents then they have in the past. To the extent that
the OEMs are successful with intellectual property infringement claims, we could
be restricted or prohibited from selling certain aftermarket products which
could have an adverse effect on our business. Future infringement claims could
also result in increased costs of doing business arising from increased legal
expenses, adverse judgments or settlements or changes to our business practices
required to settle such claims or satisfy any judgments. Litigation could result
in interpretations of the law that require us to change our business practices
or otherwise increase our costs and harm our business. We do not maintain
insurance coverage to cover the types of claims that could be asserted. If a
successful claim were brought against us, it could expose us to significant
liability.
If we are unable
to protect our intellectual property rights, our reputation and brand could be
impaired and we could lose customers.
We regard our trademarks, trade secrets
and similar intellectual property as important to our success. We rely on
trademark and copyright law, and trade secret protection, and confidentiality
and/or license agreements with employees, customers, partners and others to
protect our proprietary rights. We cannot be certain that we have taken adequate
steps to protect our proprietary rights, especially in countries where the laws
may not protect our rights as fully as in the United States. In addition, third
parties may infringe or misappropriate our proprietary rights, and we could be
required to incur significant expenses to preserve them. We have common law
trademarks, as well as pending federal trademark registrations for several marks
and one registered mark. Even if we obtain approval of such pending
registrations, the resulting registrations may not adequately cover our
inventions or protect us against infringement by others. Effective trademark,
service mark, copyright, patent and trade secret protection may not be available
in every country in which our products and services may be made available
online. We also currently own or control a number of Internet domain names,
including www.usautoparts.net, www.partstrain.com and www.autopartswarehouse.com, and
have invested time and money in the purchase of domain names and other
intellectual property, which may be impaired if we cannot protect such
intellectual property. We may be unable to protect these domain names or acquire
or maintain relevant domain names in the United States and in other countries.
If we are not able to protect our trademarks, domain names or other intellectual
property, we may experience difficulties in achieving and maintaining brand
recognition and customer loyalty.
If
our product catalog database is stolen, misappropriated or damaged, or if a
competitor is able to create a substantially similar catalog without infringing
our rights, then we may lose an important competitive advantage.
We have
invested significant resources and time to build and maintain our product
catalog, which is maintained in the form of an electronic database, and maps
SKUs to relevant product applications based on vehicle makes, models and years.
We believe that our product catalog provides us with an important competitive
advantage in both driving traffic to our websites and converting that traffic to
revenue by enabling customers to quickly locate the products they require. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to protect our product catalog from
unauthorized copying or theft by a third party or that our product catalog will
continue to operate adequately, without any technological challenges. In
addition, it is possible that a competitor could develop a catalog or database
that is similar to or more comprehensive than ours, without infringing our
rights. In the event our product catalog is damaged or is stolen, copied or
otherwise replicated by a competitor, whether lawfully or not, we may lose an
important competitive advantage and our business could be
harmed.
Our
e-commerce system is dependent on open-source software, which exposes us to
uncertainty and potential liability.
We
utilize open-source software such as Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP, Fedora and Perl
throughout our web properties and supporting infrastructure. Open-source
software is maintained and upgraded by a general community of software
developers under various open-source licenses, including the GNU General Public
License (“GPL”). These developers are under no obligation to maintain, enhance
or provide any fixes or updates to this software in the future. Additionally,
under the terms of the GPL and other open-source licenses, we may be forced to
release to the public source-code internally developed by us pursuant to such
licenses. Furthermore, if any of these developers contribute any code of others
to any of the software that we use, we may be exposed to claims and liability
for intellectual property infringement. A number of lawsuits are currently
pending against third parties over the ownership rights to the various
components within some open-source software that we use. If the outcome of these
lawsuits is unfavorable, we may be held liable for intellectual property
infringement based on our use of these open-source software components. We may
also be forced to implement changes to the code-base for this software or
replace this software with internally developed or commercially licensed
software.
We
face exposure to product liability lawsuits.
The
automotive industry in general has been subject to a large number of product
liability claims due to the nature of personal injuries that result from car
accidents or malfunctions. As a distributor of auto parts, we could be held
liable for the injury or damage caused if the products we sell are defective or
malfunction. While we carry insurance against product liability claims, if the
damages in any given action were high or we were subject to multiple lawsuits,
the damages and costs could exceed the limits of our insurance coverage. If we
were required to pay substantial damages as a result of these lawsuits, it may
seriously harm our business and financial condition. Even defending against
unsuccessful claims could cause us to incur significant expenses and result in a
diversion of management’s attention. In addition, even if the money damages
themselves did not cause substantial harm to our business, the damage to our
reputation and the brands offered on our websites could adversely affect our
future reputation and our brand, and could result in a decline in our net sales
and profitability.
Capacity
constraints on our technology infrastructure would harm our business, prospects,
results of operations and financial condition.
If the
volume of traffic on our websites or the number of purchases made by customers
increases substantially, we may need to further expand and upgrade our
technology, transaction processing systems and network infrastructure. Capacity
constraints can cause unanticipated system disruptions, slower response times,
degradation in levels of customer service, impaired quality and delays in
reporting accurate financial information.
We may be
unable to project accurately the rate or timing of traffic increases or
successfully and cost-effectively upgrade our systems and infrastructure in time
to accommodate future traffic levels on our websites. Any such upgrades to our
systems and infrastructure will require substantial expenditures. In addition,
we may be unable to upgrade and expand our transaction processing systems in an
effective and timely manner or to integrate any newly developed or purchased
functionality with our existing systems. Any inability to efficiently upgrade
our systems and infrastructure in a timely manner to account for such growth and
integrations may cause unanticipated system disruptions, slower response times,
degradation in levels of customer service, impaired quality, delayed order
fulfillment, any of which could result in a decline in our sales and harm our
reputation.
We
rely on key personnel and may need additional personnel for the success and
growth of our business.
Our
business is largely dependent on the personal efforts and abilities of key
personnel including Shane Evangelist, our Chief Executive Officer, and Michael
McClane, our Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President of Finance,
Treasurer and Secretary. Messrs. Evangelist, and McClane, as well as any of our
other key employees, can terminate their employment relationship with us at any
time. We do not maintain key person life insurance on any officer or employee.
Our performance also depends on our ability to identify, attract, retain and
motivate highly skilled technical, managerial, merchandising, marketing and call
center personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot
assure you that we will be successful in attracting and retaining such
personnel. The loss of any key employee or our inability to attract or retain
other qualified employees could harm our business and results of
operations.
Risks Related To Our Common
Stock
Our
stock price has been and may continue to be volatile, which may result in losses
to our stockholders.
The
market prices of technology and e-commerce companies generally have been
extremely volatile and have recently experienced sharp share price and trading
volume changes. The trading price of our common stock is likely to be volatile
and could fluctuate widely in response to, among other things, the risk factors
described in this report and other factors beyond our control such as
fluctuations in the operations or valuations of companies perceived by investors
to be comparable to us, our ability to meet analysts’ expectations, or
conditions or trends in the Internet or auto parts industries.
Since the
completion of our initial public offering in February 2007, the trading price of
our common stock has been volatile, declining from a high of $12.61 per share to
a low per share of $1.40. We have also experienced significant fluctuations in
the trading volume of our common stock. General economic and political
conditions unrelated to our performance may also adversely affect the price of
our common stock. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market
price of a public company’s securities, securities class action litigation has
often been initiated. In March 2007, we and certain of our officers, directors
and the underwriters for our initial public offering were served with two
putative class action complaints alleging violations of federal securities law
in connection with our initial public offering. These complaints were
subsequently consolidated. In January 2008, the parties to the litigation
reached an agreement to settle in principle, subject to confirmatory discovery,
finalization of settlement document and Court approval. If the settlement is not
consummated, the litigation would continue. In October 2008, final court
approval was obtained but is still subject to appeal. Due to the
inherent uncertainties of litigation, we cannot predict the ultimate outcome of
the litigation if it were to continue. An unfavorable result could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operation.
We
do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock.
We
currently intend to retain any future earnings and do not expect to pay any cash
dividends on our capital stock for the foreseeable future.
Our
executive officers and directors own a significant percentage of our
stock.
As of
September 30, 2008, our executive officers and directors and entities that are
affiliated with them beneficially owned approximately 56.9% of our outstanding
shares of common stock. This significant concentration of share ownership may
adversely affect the trading price for our common stock because investors often
perceive disadvantages in owning stock in companies with controlling
stockholders. Also, these stockholders, acting together, will be able to control
our management and affairs and matters requiring stockholder approval including
the election of our entire board of directors and certain significant corporate
actions such as mergers, consolidations or the sale of substantially all of our
assets. As a result, this concentration of ownership could delay, defer or
prevent others from initiating a potential merger, takeover or other change in
our control, even if these actions would benefit our other stockholders and
us.
Our
future operating results may fluctuate and may fail to meet market expectations,
which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
We expect
that our revenue and operating results will continue to fluctuate from quarter
to quarter due to various factors, many of which are beyond our control. If our
quarterly revenue or operating results fall below the expectations of investors
or securities analysts, the price of our common stock could significantly
decline. In March 2007, our stock price decreased by approximately 45% following
our announcement that our financial results for the quarter ended
December 31, 2006 did not meet analysts’ expectations. Since our initial
public offering in February 2007, the sales price per share of our common stock
has fluctuated between a high of $12.61 and a low of $1.40. The factors that
could cause our operating results to continue to fluctuate include, but are not
limited to:
|
•
|
|
fluctuations
in the demand for aftermarket auto
parts;
|
|
•
|
|
price
competition on the Internet or among offline retailers for auto
parts;
|
|
•
|
|
our
ability to attract visitors to our websites and convert those visitors
into customers;
|
|
•
|
|
our
ability to maintain and expand our supplier and distribution
relationships;
|
|
•
|
|
the
effects of seasonality on the demand for our
products;
|
|
•
|
|
our
ability to accurately forecast demand for our products, price our products
at market rates and maintain appropriate inventory
levels;
|
|
•
|
|
our
ability to build and maintain customer
loyalty;
|
|
•
|
|
infringement
actions that could impact the viability of the auto parts aftermarket, or
portions thereof;
|
|
•
|
|
the
success of our brand-building and marketing
campaigns;
|
|
•
|
|
our
ability to accurately project our future revenues, earnings, and results
of operations;
|
|
•
|
|
government
regulations related to use of the Internet for commerce, including the
application of existing tax regulations to Internet commerce and changes
in tax regulations;
|
|
•
|
|
technical
difficulties, system downtime or Internet brownouts;
and
|
|
•
|
|
the
amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to
expansion of our business, operations and
infrastructure.
|
Two
class action lawsuits have been filed against us and certain of our officers and
directors and there is an SEC informal inquiry into this matter, which has
resulted and may continue to result in significant costs and a diversion of our
management’s efforts.
We and
certain of our officers, directors and underwriters were served with two
complaints associated with class action lawsuits alleging violations of federal
securities law in connection with our initial public offering. In January 2008,
we and the lead plaintiff’s counsel reached a non-binding proposed settlement
agreement under a memorandum of understanding (“MOU”), which outlines the
general terms to be included in the binding agreement. We entered into a
settlement agreement in this regard in May 2008, and the court approved the
settlement in October 2008. A settlement payment of $10.0 million will be paid
to the lead plaintiff’s counsel within thirty days of a court-approved
settlement. We funded the settlement consideration in July 2008 to an escrow
account which will be disbursed after the 30-day appeal period has
expired. We cannot assure you that an appeal will not be filed, and
therefore we could be subject to incur additional significant costs and/or
result in the further diversion of the attention of management and other key
employees.
We
will incur increased costs and compliance risks as a result of being a public
company.
We
completed our initial public offering in February 2007. As a public company, we
have and expect to continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other
expenses that we did not incur as a private company. These expenses are
associated with our public company reporting requirements and certain corporate
governance requirements, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and the new rules implemented by the SEC and the NASDAQ Stock Market.
Compliance with these rules and regulations, in particular Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has increased, and is expected to continue to
substantially increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will likely
require us to hire additional personnel and/or consultants. Like many smaller
public companies, we expect to face a significant impact from required
compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The process
of strengthening our internal control and complying with Section 404 has
been and is expected to continue to be expensive and time consuming, and has and
is expected to continue to require significant time and attention from our
management team. We continue to evaluate and monitor developments with respect
to these new rules, and we cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional
costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.
We also
expect these new rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more
expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may
be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially
higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more
difficult for us to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on our
board of directors or as executive officers.
If
we fail to develop and maintain an effective system of internal control over
financial reporting or are not able to adequately address certain identified
material weaknesses in our system of internal controls or comply with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we may not be able to
accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud, and our stock price
could decline.
Management
has identified a material weakness in our financial statement close process and
contributing deficiencies in our information technology general controls and has
concluded that our internal control over financial reporting were not effective
as of December 31, 2007. If we fail to adequately address this material
weakness, we may not be able to improve our system of internal control over
financial reporting to comply with the reporting requirements applicable to
public companies in the United States. Furthermore, because we have not
completed the testing of the operation of our internal controls, it is possible
that we or our auditors will identify additional material weaknesses or
significant deficiencies in the future in our system of internal control over
financial reporting. Our failure to address any deficiencies or weaknesses in
our internal control over financial reporting or to properly maintain an
effective system of internal control over financial reporting could impact our
ability to prevent fraud or to issue our financial statements in a timely manner
that presents fairly our financial condition and results of operations. The
existence of any such deficiencies or weaknesses, even if cured, may also lead
to the loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial
statements, could harm our business and negatively impact the trading price of
our common stock. Such deficiencies or material weaknesses may also subject us
to lawsuits, investigations and other penalties.
In
addition, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 required us to
evaluate and report on our internal control over financial reporting with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and have
our independent auditors attest to our evaluation, beginning with our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009. While we have
prepared an internal plan of action for compliance with Section 404 and for
strengthening and testing our system of internal control to provide the basis
for our report and the attestation report by our independent auditing firm, we
cannot assure you that this plan of action will be sufficient to meet the
rigorous requirements of Section 404, and our independent auditors may
issue an adverse opinion regarding management’s assessment of Section 404
compliance. Our failure to comply with Section 404 or our reporting
requirements would reduce investors’ confidence in our financial statements and
harm our stock price and could subject us to a variety of administrative
sanctions, including the suspension or delisting of our common stock from the
NASDAQ Global Market and the inability of registered broker/dealers to make a
market in our common stock, which could also cause our stock price to
decline.
Our
charter documents could deter a takeover effort, which could inhibit your
ability to receive an acquisition premium for your shares.
Provisions
in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could make it more difficult for
a third party to acquire us, even if doing so would be beneficial to our
stockholders. Such provisions include the following:
|
•
|
|
our
board of directors are authorized, without prior stockholder approval, to
create and issue preferred stock which could be used to implement
anti-takeover devices;
|
|
•
|
|
advance
notice is required for director nominations or for proposals that can be
acted upon at stockholder meetings;
|
|
•
|
|
our
board of directors is classified such that not all members of our board
are elected at one time, which may make it more difficult for a person who
acquires control of a majority of our outstanding voting stock to replace
all or a majority of our directors;
|
|
•
|
|
stockholder
action by written consent is prohibited except with regards to an action
that has been approved by the
board;
|
|
•
|
|
special
meetings of the stockholders are permitted to be called only by the
chairman of our board of directors, our chief executive officer or by a
majority of our board of directors;
|
|
•
|
|
stockholders
are not be permitted to cumulate their votes for the election of
directors; and
|
|
•
|
|
stockholders
are permitted to amend certain provisions of our bylaws only upon
receiving at least 66 2/3% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of
all outstanding shares then entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors, voting together as a single
class.
|
General Market and Industry
Risk
The
success of our business depends on the continued growth of the Internet as a
retail marketplace and the related expansion of the Internet
infrastructure.
Our
future success depends upon the continued and widespread acceptance and adoption
of the Internet as a vehicle to purchase products. If customers or manufacturers
are unwilling to use the Internet to conduct business and exchange information,
our business will fail. The commercial acceptance and use of the Internet may
not continue to develop at historical rates, or may not develop as quickly as we
expect. The growth of the Internet, and in turn the growth of our business, may
be inhibited by concerns over privacy and security, including concerns regarding
“viruses” and “worms,” reliability issues arising from outages or damage to
Internet infrastructure, delays in development or adoption of new standards and
protocols to handle the demands of increased Internet activity, decreased
accessibility, increased government regulation, and taxation of Internet
activity. In addition, our business growth may be adversely affected if the
Internet infrastructure does not keep pace with the growing Internet activity
and is unable to support the demands placed upon it, or if there is any delay in
the development of enabling technologies and performance
improvements.
Negative
conditions in the global credit markets may impair the liquidity of a portion of
our investments portfolio, and adversely affect our results of operations and
access to financing.
Our
investment securities consist of high-grade ARPS. As of September 30, 2008, our
long-term marketable securities were comprised of $6.5 million of high-grade
(AAA rated) ARPS issued primarily by close end funds that primarily hold debt
obligations from municipalities. The recent negative conditions in the global
credit markets have prevented some investors from liquidating their holdings,
including their holdings of ARPS. In response to the credit situation, on
February 8, 2008, we instructed our investment advisor to liquidate all our
investments in close end funds and move these funds into money market
investments. On February 13, 2008, we were informed that there was
insufficient demand at auction for our remaining four high-grade ARPS,
representing approximately $7.8 million. As a result, these affected securities
currently are not liquid, and have been reclassified as long-term
investments. As of September 30, 2008, $1.3 million of its
investments in ARPS were redeemed. We do not know when we will have
access to the capital in these remaining investments. In the event we need to
access the funds that are in an illiquid state, we will not be able to do so
without a loss of principal or until a future auction on these investments is
successful, the securities are redeemed by the issuer or a secondary market
emerges. If we cannot readily access these funds, we may be required to borrow
funds or issue additional debt or equity securities to meet our capital
requirements. At this time, management has concluded that these remaining
investments are impaired and has recorded an impairment charge to other
comprehensive income totaling $149,000. Management is not sure that
these investments will not be settled in the short term, although the market for
these investments is presently uncertain. If the credit ratings of the security
issuers deteriorate and any decline in market value is determined to be
other-than-temporary, we would be required to adjust the carrying value of the
investment through an additional impairment charge.
If
we fail to offer a broad selection of products at competitive prices to meet our
customers’ demands, our revenue could decline.
In order
to expand our business, we must successfully offer, on a continuous basis, a
broad selection of auto parts that meet the needs of our customers. Our auto
parts are used by consumers for a variety of purposes, including repair,
performance, improved aesthetics and functionality. In addition, to be
successful, our product offerings must be broad and deep in scope, competitively
priced, well-made, innovative and attractive to a wide range of consumers. We
cannot predict with certainty that we will be successful in offering products
that meet all of these requirements. If our product offerings fail to satisfy
our customers’ requirements or respond to changes in customer preferences, our
revenue could decline.
System
failures, including failures due to natural disasters or other catastrophic
events, could prevent access to our websites, which could reduce our net sales
and harm our reputation.
Our sales
would decline and we could lose existing or potential customers if they are not
able to access our websites or if our websites, transactions processing systems
or network infrastructure do not perform to our customers’ satisfaction. Any
Internet network interruptions or problems with our websites could:
|
•
|
|
prevent
customers from accessing our
websites;
|
|
•
|
|
reduce
our ability to fulfill orders or bill
customers;
|
|
•
|
|
reduce
the number of products that we
sell;
|
|
•
|
|
cause
customer dissatisfaction; or
|
|
•
|
|
damage
our brand and reputation.
|
We have
experienced brief computer system interruptions in the past, and we believe they
will continue to occur from time to time in the future. Our systems and
operations are also vulnerable to damage or interruption from a number of
sources, including a natural disaster or other catastrophic event such as an
earthquake, typhoon, volcanic eruption, fire, flood, terrorist attack, computer
viruses, power loss, telecommunications failure, physical and electronic
break-ins and other similar events. For example, our headquarters and the
majority of our infrastructure, including some of our servers, are located in
Southern California, a seismically active region. We also maintain offshore and
outsourced operations in the Philippines, an area that has been subjected to a
typhoon and a volcanic eruption in the past. In addition, California has in the
past experienced power outages as a result of limited electrical power supplies
and due to recent fires in the southern part of the state. Such outages, natural
disasters and similar events may recur in the future and could disrupt the
operation of our business. Our technology infrastructure is also vulnerable to
computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions.
Although the critical portions of our systems are redundant and backup copies
are maintained offsite, not all of our systems and data are fully redundant. We
do not presently have a formal disaster recovery plan in effect and may not have
sufficient insurance for losses that may occur from natural disasters or
catastrophic events. Any substantial disruption of our technology infrastructure
could cause interruptions or delays in our business and loss of data or render
us unable to accept and fulfill customer orders or operate our websites in a
timely manner, or at all.
We
may be subject to liability for sales and other taxes and penalties, which could
have an adverse effect on our business.
We
currently collect sales or other similar taxes only on the shipment of goods to
the states of California, New Jersey, Kansas and Tennessee. The U.S. Supreme
Court has ruled that vendors whose only connection with customers in a state is
by common carrier or the U.S. mail are free from state-imposed duties to collect
sales and use taxes in that state. However, states could seek to impose
additional income tax obligations or sales tax collection obligations on
out-of-state companies such as ours, which engage in or facilitate online
commerce, based on their interpretation of existing laws, including the Supreme
Court ruling, or specific facts relating to us. If sales tax obligations are
successfully imposed upon us by a state or other jurisdiction, we could be
exposed to substantial tax liabilities for past sales and penalties and fines
for failure to collect sales taxes. We could also suffer decreased sales in that
state or jurisdiction as the effective cost of purchasing goods from us
increases for those residing in that state or jurisdiction.
In
addition, a number of states, as well as the U.S. Congress, have been
considering various initiatives that could limit or supersede the Supreme
Court’s apparent position regarding sales and use taxes on Internet sales. If
any of these initiatives are enacted, we could be required to collect sales and
use taxes in additional states and our revenue could be adversely affected.
Furthermore, the U.S. Congress has not yet extended a moratorium, which was
first imposed in 1998 but has since expired, on state and local governments’
ability to impose new taxes on Internet access and Internet transactions. The
imposition by state and local governments of various taxes upon Internet
commerce could create administrative burdens for us as well as substantially
impair the growth of e-commerce and adversely affect our revenue and
profitability. Since our service is available over the Internet in multiple
states, these jurisdictions may require us to qualify to do business in these
states. If we fail to qualify in a jurisdiction that requires us to do so, we
could face liabilities for taxes and penalties.
Additionally,
in 2008, New York enacted a measure that requires many online retailers to begin
collecting sales taxes on purchases shipped to the state, even if they have no
operations or employees working there.
Economic
conditions may have an adverse effect on the demand for aftermarket auto parts
and could adversely affect our sales and operating results.
We sell
aftermarket auto parts consisting of body and engine parts used for repair and
maintenance, performance parts used to enhance performance or improve aesthetics
and accessories that increase functionality or enhance a vehicle’s features.
Demand for our products may be adversely affected by general economic
conditions. In declining economies, consumers often defer regular vehicle
maintenance and may forego purchases of nonessential performance and accessories
products, which can result in a decrease in demand for auto parts in general. In
expanding economies, consumers may be more likely to purchase new vehicles
instead of repairing existing vehicles or they may be less price sensitive,
leading to an increase in OEM parts sales at dealerships, either of which could
also result in a decline in our sales. If such decreases in demand for our
products are not offset by other factors, such as the deferral of new car
purchases in declining economies, which may result in more required repairs for
older vehicles, or the purchase of performance parts and accessories in
expanding economies, our financial condition and results of operations would
suffer. In addition, during economic downturns some competitors may
become more aggressive in their pricing practices, which would adversely impact
our gross margin and could cause large fluctuations in our stock
price.
Vehicle
miles driven may decrease, resulting in a decline of our revenues and negatively
affecting our results of operations.
We and
our industry depend on the number of vehicle miles driven. Factors that may
cause the number of vehicle miles and our revenues and our results of operations
to decrease include; the economy, as described above; gas prices, as increases
in gas prices may deter consumers from using their vehicles; and travel
patterns, as changes in travel patterns may cause consumers to rely more heavily
on train and airplane transportation.
We
could be liable for breaches of security on our websites.
A
fundamental requirement for e-commerce is the secure transmission of
confidential information over public networks. Anyone who is able to circumvent
our security measures could misappropriate proprietary information or cause
interruptions in our operations. Although we have developed systems and
processes that are designed to protect consumer information and prevent
fraudulent credit card transactions and other security breaches, failure to
mitigate such fraud or breaches may adversely affect our operating results. We
may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect
against potential security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by any
breach. We rely on licensed encryption and authentication technology to provide
the security and authentication necessary for secure transmission of
confidential information, including credit card numbers. Advances in computer
capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography, or other events or
developments may result in a compromise or breach of the algorithms that we use
to protect customer transaction data. In the event someone circumvents our
security measures, it could seriously harm our business and reputation and we
could lose customers. Security breaches could also expose us to a risk of loss
or litigation and possible liability for failing to secure confidential customer
information.
If
we do not respond to technological change, our websites could become obsolete
and our financial results and conditions could be adversely
affected.
We
maintain a network of websites which requires substantial development and
maintenance efforts, and entails significant technical and business risks. To
remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the responsiveness,
functionality and features of our websites. The Internet and the e-commerce
industry are characterized by rapid technological change, the emergence of new
industry standards and practices and changes in customer requirements and
preferences. Therefore, we may be required to license emerging technologies,
enhance our existing websites, develop new services and technology that address
the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our current and prospective
customers, and adapt to technological advances and emerging industry and
regulatory standards and practices in a cost-effective and timely manner. Our
ability to remain technologically competitive may require substantial
expenditures and lead time and our failure to do so may harm our business and
results of operations.
Existing
or future government regulation could expose us to liabilities and costly
changes in our business operations and could reduce customer demand for our
products and services.
We are
subject to federal and state consumer protection laws and regulations, including
laws protecting the privacy of customer non-public information and regulations
prohibiting unfair and deceptive trade practices, as well as laws and
regulations governing businesses in general and the Internet and e-commerce.
Additional laws and regulations may be adopted with respect to the Internet, the
effect of which on e-commerce is uncertain. These laws may cover issues such as
user privacy, spyware and the tracking of consumer activities, marketing e-mails
and communications, other advertising and promotional practices, money
transfers, pricing, content and quality of products and services, taxation,
electronic contracts and other communications, intellectual property rights, and
information security. Furthermore, it is not clear how existing laws such as
those governing issues such as property ownership, sales and other taxes,
trespass, data mining and collection, and personal privacy apply to the Internet
and e-commerce. To the extent we expand into international markets, we will be
faced with complying with local laws and regulations, some of which may be
materially different than U.S. laws and regulations. Any such foreign law or
regulation, any new U.S. law or regulation, or the interpretation or application
of existing laws and regulations to the Internet or other online services, may
have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition
and results of operations by, among other things, impeding the growth of the
Internet, subjecting us to fines, penalties, damages or other liabilities,
requiring costly changes in our business operations and practices, and reducing
customer demand for our products and services. We do not maintain insurance
coverage to cover the types of claims or liabilities that could arise as a
result of such regulation.
The
United States government may substantially increase border controls and impose
restrictions on cross-border commerce that may substantially harm our
business.
We
purchase a substantial portion of our products from foreign manufacturers and
other suppliers who source products internationally. Restrictions on shipping
goods into the United States from other countries pose a substantial risk to our
business. Particularly since the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001,
the United States government has substantially increased border surveillance and
controls. If the United States were to impose further border controls and
restrictions, impose quotas, tariffs or import duties, increase the
documentation requirements applicable to cross border shipments or take other
actions that have the effect of restricting the flow of goods from other
countries to the United States, we may have greater difficulty acquiring our
inventory in a timely manner, experience shipping delays, or incur increased
costs and expenses, all of which would substantially harm our business and
results of operations.
ITEM 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
Sales of Unregistered
Securities
None.
Use
of Proceeds from Sales of Registered Securities
On
February 14, 2007, we completed the initial public offering of our common stock,
pursuant to which we sold 8,000,000 shares of our common stock and the selling
stockholders sold an aggregate of 3,500,000 shares of our common stock (which
included 1,500,000 shares sold by the selling stockholders pursuant to the
exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option) at the initial public
offering price of $10.00 per share. The shares of common stock sold in the
offering were registered under the Securities Act on a registration statement on
Form S-1 (File. No. 333-138379) that was declared effective by the SEC on
February 8, 2007. RBC Capital Markets Corporation, Thomas Weisel Partners LLC,
Piper Jaffray & Co., and JMP Securities LLC were the co-managing
underwriters for the offering.
The
aggregate purchase price of the shares sold by us in the offering was $80.0
million. The aggregate purchase price of the shares sold by the selling
stockholders was $35.0 million. We and the selling stockholders paid to the
underwriters underwriting discounts and commissions totaling $5.6 million and
$2.5 million, respectively, in connection with the offering. In addition, we
incurred additional expenses of approximately $2.9 million in connection with
the offering. After deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and
offering expenses, we received net proceeds from the offering of approximately
$71.5 million. We did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the
selling stockholders.
Approximately
$28.0 million of the net proceeds from the offering was used to repay our
outstanding indebtedness under two term loans for approximately $18.0 million
and $10.0 million, payable to our commercial lender. In addition, $5.0 million
of the net proceeds from the offering has been paid on the notes payable to the
former stockholders of Partsbin. Except for the payment of such debt, none of
the net proceeds from the offering were paid directly or indirectly to any of
our directors or officers (or their associates) or persons owning ten percent or
more of any class of our equity securities or to any other affiliate, other than
in the form of wages or salaries and bonuses paid out in the ordinary course of
business. In July 2008, the Company used $3.4 million to pay litigation
settlement costs related to the stockholder class action lawsuit. See
Note 5 of Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in
Part I of this report. The remaining net proceeds from the offering
have been invested in investment-grade securities and cash equivalents. We will
retain broad discretion over the use of the net proceeds received from our
initial public offering. The amount and timing of our actual expenditures may
vary significantly depending on a number of factors, including, but not limited
to, the growth of our sales and customer base, the type of efforts we make
to build our brand, and investments in our business.
ITEM 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities.
|
None.
ITEM 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
|
None.
ITEM 5.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
The following
exhibits are filed herewith.
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
|
|
|
Stipulation
of settlement in the matter entitled: In re U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc.
Securities Litigation, Case No. CV 07-2030-GW (JC)
|
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of the principal executive officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
|
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of the principal financial officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
|
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
November 6, 2008
|
|
U.S.
AUTO PARTS NETWORK, INC.
|
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
/s/
SHANE EVANGELIST |
|
|
|
|
Shane
Evangelist
|
|
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
/s/ MICHAEL
J. McCLANE |
|
|
|
|
Michael
J. McClane
|
|
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
EXHIBIT
INDEX
|
|
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
|
|
10.1
|
Stipulation
of settlement in the matter entitled: In re U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc.
Securities Litigation, Case No. CV 07-2030-GW (JC)
|
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of the principal executive officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
|
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of the principal financial officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
|
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|