Shop Parts keyboard_double_arrow_right
Need car parts? Select your vehicle
Reading Time: 3 minutes
Summary
  • You may need a replacement oxygen sensor if your existing O2 sensor’s pattern on a scan tool appears ragged and somewhat rich.
  • The Denso oxygen sensor looks slightly different from the OEM but worked fine. The leads were longer and the sensor bulb cage was also a different design.
  • The oxygen sensors came with anti-seize packets and the compound is the copper-based type, which is better than graphite.
  • On the 2006 Explorer 4.0L, one of the sensors was resistant enough to loosening that an air hammer had to be used. Reconnecting the new sensors was also somewhat challenging due to the connector locations.
  • Upon testing, the new sensors produced a more accurate pattern than the OEM.

Key Information

Why You May Need A Denso Oxygen Sensor

My existing O2 Sensors both have a ragged, lazy rich pattern. Using the scan tool, all inputs are as they should be, fuel trims are acceptable, and there are no DTCs. However, the O2 sensor switching pattern, while adequate to maintain proper fuel trim, looks to me to be ragged and somewhat rich.

Product Review

Denso Replacement Oxygen Sensor

The Denso oxygen sensor, despite slight design differences from the OEM, worked well after some installation challenges, producing a more accurate pattern on the scan tool than the old sensor on a 2006 Ford Explorer 4.0L.

Price may change from the time the review is published. This product is also available from other stores.

Why You Should Trust This Review

  • This is an unbiased review. The product reviewer agreed with CarParts.com to provide a completely unbiased review of the product. The reviewer did not receive any monetary compensation for this review.
  • The product reviewer is an expert in their field. CarParts.com strives to provide quality product reviews that look at key aspects customers care about. To achieve this goal, we work with professional mechanics and automotive enthusiasts experienced in DIY auto repair and maintenance who have high standards when it comes to performance, durability, ease of installation, and pricing among other things.
  • You’re seeing actual photos and videos of products ordered from CarParts.com. The products sent to the reviewer were not pre-selected to choose the best of their kind. The products were ordered and shipped to the reviewer the same way for most customers.

Initial Observations

The unit was slightly different but worked fine. The leads were longer than the OEM’s. The sensor bulb cage was also a different design. However, no issues arose with either of these.

The Fit

The Denso oxygen sensors came with anti-seize packets (some already have it on the threads when the sensor is unpackaged). The longer leads aren’t so much a problem – shorter leads would be. The included anti-seize compound is the copper-based type, and is better than graphite.

image of new and old o2 sensors
New Denso oxygen sensors side by side old OEM sensors for a 2006 Ford Explorer | Image Source: Richard McCuistian

Installation

On the 2006 Explorer 4.0L, the sensor connectors are somewhat challenging and one of the sensors was resistant enough to loosening that an air hammer had to be used. Reconnecting the new sensors was also somewhat challenging due to the connector locations.

Performance and Overall Quality

The pattern the new sensors produced was more satisfactory than the original sensors, which had nearly 100,000 miles. And O2 sensors do wear out sometimes and get skewed or sluggish. Since the pattern was the same on both OEM sensors, it may have been due to the different bulb cage design, but the new sensors (I believe) are producing a more accurate pattern.

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Denso is a well known brand that can be trusted.

Cons

  • The sensors weren’t exactly like the OEM and the leads were longer and needed to be wire-tied to prevent chafing, etc.

The Verdict

Great overall value. I highly recommend these Denso sensors from CarParts.com for a durable replacement.

Similar Products

About The Author
Reviewed By Technical Reviewer at CarParts.com

Richard McCuistian has worked for nearly 50 years in the automotive field as a professional technician, an instructor, and a freelance automotive writer for Motor Age, ACtion magazine, Power Stroke Registry, and others. Richard is ASE certified for more than 30 years in 10 categories, including L1 Advanced Engine Performance and Light Vehicle Diesel.

Any information provided on this Website is for informational purposes only and is not intended to replace consultation with a professional mechanic. The accuracy and timeliness of the information may change from the time of publication.

File Under : Product Reviews
CP Membership Plus
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
expand_more
CarParts.com Answers BE PART OF OUR COMMUNITY: Share your knowledge & help fellow drivers Join Now
The owner of this website has made a commitment to accessibility and inclusion, please report any problems that you encounter using the contact form on this website. This site uses the WP ADA Compliance Check plugin to enhance accessibility.